Other Sports2 mins ago
Council Car Park - Damage Caused To Car
13 Answers
A car was damaged by a branch hanging low from a tree. The offending branch was low and couldn't be seen as the driver reversed into the last space in a row.
What compensation can be requested against the council in this situation and how? (The damage would cost about 30 quid to make good.)
Not worth instructing solicitors and small claims would be too much hassle, probably.
What compensation can be requested against the council in this situation and how? (The damage would cost about 30 quid to make good.)
Not worth instructing solicitors and small claims would be too much hassle, probably.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Iggle Piggle. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It would be hard to establish negligence on the part of the council.
As an analogy, if you trip over a raised flagstone (on a council-owned footpath) you don't have an automatic right to compensation from the council. The flagstone might only have become damaged a few minutes earlier by a lorry driving over it, leaving the council no time to become aware of the problem and arrange for it to be fixed. In order to get compensation you'd have to show that the flagstone had been displaced for some time and that the council either knew about it or, at least, should have known about it (and should had done nothing about it).
So if the branch was only hanging low because of recent winds and rain, it would be unreasonable to expect the council to know about it and thus there was no negligence on the part of the council.
You could try a simple letter to the council, seeking compensation, though (preferably accompanied by photographs of the tree and the damage to the car). It might work, simply because the council might take the view that it wasn't worth the time and hassle of getting into a dispute over such a small sum. (My father tripped over a flagstone, ripping the knee of his trousers. He sent a letter to the council - enclosing his trousers! - and received compensation. However that was half a century ago and councils are now far more likely to stick to the rule of "no proof of negligence = no compensation").
As an analogy, if you trip over a raised flagstone (on a council-owned footpath) you don't have an automatic right to compensation from the council. The flagstone might only have become damaged a few minutes earlier by a lorry driving over it, leaving the council no time to become aware of the problem and arrange for it to be fixed. In order to get compensation you'd have to show that the flagstone had been displaced for some time and that the council either knew about it or, at least, should have known about it (and should had done nothing about it).
So if the branch was only hanging low because of recent winds and rain, it would be unreasonable to expect the council to know about it and thus there was no negligence on the part of the council.
You could try a simple letter to the council, seeking compensation, though (preferably accompanied by photographs of the tree and the damage to the car). It might work, simply because the council might take the view that it wasn't worth the time and hassle of getting into a dispute over such a small sum. (My father tripped over a flagstone, ripping the knee of his trousers. He sent a letter to the council - enclosing his trousers! - and received compensation. However that was half a century ago and councils are now far more likely to stick to the rule of "no proof of negligence = no compensation").
-- answer removed --