Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Injury
16 Answers
Hello all
I chased after a youth who smashed my car window whilst it was sat on the drive.
As I was chasing him, I fell and badly injured my knee, needing medical care and 2 months off work.
I knew who the youth was and he was questioned by the police but refused to admit it was him but the court decided that he did do it and was ordered to pay the costs of the damage.
My question is, can I now make a personal claim against him for my injury bearing in mind I was only chasing him due to his actions. Is there anyway I can claim compensation against him.
This is not about the money but about the permanent injury I will now carry for the rest of my due to this morons actions
Any advise will help
Kind regards
I chased after a youth who smashed my car window whilst it was sat on the drive.
As I was chasing him, I fell and badly injured my knee, needing medical care and 2 months off work.
I knew who the youth was and he was questioned by the police but refused to admit it was him but the court decided that he did do it and was ordered to pay the costs of the damage.
My question is, can I now make a personal claim against him for my injury bearing in mind I was only chasing him due to his actions. Is there anyway I can claim compensation against him.
This is not about the money but about the permanent injury I will now carry for the rest of my due to this morons actions
Any advise will help
Kind regards
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by needtoknowbasis. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.well I am extremely sorry that you have permanently injured yourself in chasing this twerp
Is it intentional injury on the twerp's part - the difficulty is taht you chose to chase the fella. The leading case is Letang V cCooper 1965
http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /Letang _v_Coop er
the alternative is an action in negligence. The difficulty here is that the leading case is... letang v cooper and twerp if you think about it, wasnt really negligent
the next difficulty is causation - but for the twerp smashing your window you would not have suffered injury - but oops you fell over....
so the but-for test isnt fulfilled
things are looking bad for any civil action I think
Is it intentional injury on the twerp's part - the difficulty is taht you chose to chase the fella. The leading case is Letang V cCooper 1965
http://
the alternative is an action in negligence. The difficulty here is that the leading case is... letang v cooper and twerp if you think about it, wasnt really negligent
the next difficulty is causation - but for the twerp smashing your window you would not have suffered injury - but oops you fell over....
so the but-for test isnt fulfilled
things are looking bad for any civil action I think
Eddie, is your answer based on fact or opinion?
The reason I ask is, I like you would have thought that it was my decision to chase him so I would have no case.
A police officer asked me (after the case had gone to court) if he had also been charged with assault due to the fact that his actions had resulted in me giving chase to him and causing the injury. If he had not done it ,I would never have had the injury.
The reason I ask is, I like you would have thought that it was my decision to chase him so I would have no case.
A police officer asked me (after the case had gone to court) if he had also been charged with assault due to the fact that his actions had resulted in me giving chase to him and causing the injury. If he had not done it ,I would never have had the injury.
Your only hope ....
is to claim against a house holder's house insurance....
twerp wont have one - it will probably be in the name of his dad and therefore no good
Judge Russell agreed that damages would be entered for a bus drivers post traumatic stress disorder against the woman who stepped out in front of his bus ( who had household insurance )
incredible but true - I know the insurance agent who put them up to it
is to claim against a house holder's house insurance....
twerp wont have one - it will probably be in the name of his dad and therefore no good
Judge Russell agreed that damages would be entered for a bus drivers post traumatic stress disorder against the woman who stepped out in front of his bus ( who had household insurance )
incredible but true - I know the insurance agent who put them up to it