Body & Soul2 mins ago
I cant afford a solicitor at court and i have to represent myself please help!
49 Answers
I have been arrested and charged with ABH but attended court to plead guilty or not guilty which i have pleaded not guilty. The procecution have now decided that they have to have a week to decide if the injuries are of ABH or common assault, which the duty solicitor advise me that it will probably be common assault. I will lose my job if i am found guilty as i work for the police and i do not qualify for legal aid as i earn to much, well more than 10k. I have no choice but to represent myself in a magistrate court, the main thing is that i am not sure what questions i am allowed to ask the victim and his friends who are witnesses. I have proof that he is lying and medical evidence from the A & E doctor states that he has 2 previous fractures to his nose and that he friends state that they saw exactly what happend and had a clear view of the incident but one witness said i hit hit with my left and the other witness said i used my right hand. i did not punch anyone. Am i allowed to question them all this in court and will the magistrate guide me along ? please can somebody help me ?>. kind regards andrew
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by uglysmithy80. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
[Two Part Answer]
And in any case, ugly, the police are not the best people to ask for legal advice, especially of the type you require. I come into contact with a number of police officers in connection with some of the work that I do. Most of them are unfamiliar with court proceedings beyond the bare basics (and indeed they have no need to have such knowledge). Even if you have access to probation officers, they too would not be best qualified in this field. The magistrates form an impartial tribunal and cannot assist either side.
First of all Legal Aid. If, after deducting your living expenses, you are left with £12,475 per annum, you will receive Legal Aid. If you have between £12,475 and £22,275 you will get some help. Above this amount you will receive no aid. If you think you are below or around these limits it is worth making a claim. The Legal Aid assessment takes in a number of things when calculating your living expenses.
And in any case, ugly, the police are not the best people to ask for legal advice, especially of the type you require. I come into contact with a number of police officers in connection with some of the work that I do. Most of them are unfamiliar with court proceedings beyond the bare basics (and indeed they have no need to have such knowledge). Even if you have access to probation officers, they too would not be best qualified in this field. The magistrates form an impartial tribunal and cannot assist either side.
First of all Legal Aid. If, after deducting your living expenses, you are left with £12,475 per annum, you will receive Legal Aid. If you have between £12,475 and £22,275 you will get some help. Above this amount you will receive no aid. If you think you are below or around these limits it is worth making a claim. The Legal Aid assessment takes in a number of things when calculating your living expenses.
[Part Two]
If you do have to defend yourself the best assistance you will get comes from the court’s Legal Advisor (LA). She (and I’ll say she as 95% of them are female) is the person you might know as the “Clerk of the Court” who sits in front of the magistrates. She has a duty to assist unrepresented defendants by acquainting them with the court’s procedures and assisting them (but only up to a point) with their defence.
If your matter goes to trial you should arrive early and tell the court receptionist or usher that you need to see her before the trial begins. (In fact she will probably seek you out when she learns that you are unrepresented). You should tell her what the basis of your defence is and how you seek to prove your innocence. By then you should have been served with the evidence against you (usually in the form of statements made by the alleged victim and any other witnesses) so you will be able to see what they have said to the police.
Although she has to remain impartial she should assist you before the trial by suggesting how you might frame your questions, and also steer you down the right road during the trial.
If you do have to defend yourself the best assistance you will get comes from the court’s Legal Advisor (LA). She (and I’ll say she as 95% of them are female) is the person you might know as the “Clerk of the Court” who sits in front of the magistrates. She has a duty to assist unrepresented defendants by acquainting them with the court’s procedures and assisting them (but only up to a point) with their defence.
If your matter goes to trial you should arrive early and tell the court receptionist or usher that you need to see her before the trial begins. (In fact she will probably seek you out when she learns that you are unrepresented). You should tell her what the basis of your defence is and how you seek to prove your innocence. By then you should have been served with the evidence against you (usually in the form of statements made by the alleged victim and any other witnesses) so you will be able to see what they have said to the police.
Although she has to remain impartial she should assist you before the trial by suggesting how you might frame your questions, and also steer you down the right road during the trial.
Unfortunately you will go considerably far wrong with tambourine’s suggestion, ugly.
The magistrates’ court will not award compensation to cover your legal fees if you are acquitted. They will only reimburse travelling costs and other sundry items (for example, if the court is some distance from where you live and you had to stay overnight).
If you try to recover your legal costs by means of a civil action you will almost certainly fail. County Courts (which is where the matter will be dealt with) do not award compensation in such circumstances unless there has been an abuse of the court process or you were otherwise maliciously or wrongly prosecuted. The Crown Prosecution Service will have seen to it that the prosecution was properly brought before authorising charges. If such compensation were available every person who was acquitted would seek to recover their legal costs by this means, and clearly they do not. There is, of course, the added complication that in the County Court you will either have to pay for representation or represent yourself!
I don’t know what connection sara has with the courts but whatever it is she should know that many police officers – particularly the younger ones who joined before the CPS took over the role of prosecutors - have very little knowledge of court procedures. They cannot be expected to know about the trial process, rules of evidence or cross examination procedures, all of which you need to know in order to defend yourself. So even if you were able to have access to some of your serving officer colleagues, it would not be much use to you.
The magistrates’ court will not award compensation to cover your legal fees if you are acquitted. They will only reimburse travelling costs and other sundry items (for example, if the court is some distance from where you live and you had to stay overnight).
If you try to recover your legal costs by means of a civil action you will almost certainly fail. County Courts (which is where the matter will be dealt with) do not award compensation in such circumstances unless there has been an abuse of the court process or you were otherwise maliciously or wrongly prosecuted. The Crown Prosecution Service will have seen to it that the prosecution was properly brought before authorising charges. If such compensation were available every person who was acquitted would seek to recover their legal costs by this means, and clearly they do not. There is, of course, the added complication that in the County Court you will either have to pay for representation or represent yourself!
I don’t know what connection sara has with the courts but whatever it is she should know that many police officers – particularly the younger ones who joined before the CPS took over the role of prosecutors - have very little knowledge of court procedures. They cannot be expected to know about the trial process, rules of evidence or cross examination procedures, all of which you need to know in order to defend yourself. So even if you were able to have access to some of your serving officer colleagues, it would not be much use to you.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank7 mins ago
News20 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
Are The West In The Grip Of The Woke...
News26 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.