is it true that if a man buys a woman an engagement ring and they split before they wed does the ring belong the man and can claim it back legally due to the significance of the ring??
this is what ive heard and would like it clarified off someone that may know about the law surrounding this
I doubt it. A gift is a gift. It used to be the case that engagement - hence the ring - had a legal status and ditching your bird was actionable, especially if you had 'used' her (oh the phraseology!) thereby 'ruining' her. But not any more.
JJ (best prog in the world by the way) judge judy always says that if a ring is given in contemplation of marriage and the marriage doesn't go ahead, the ring goes back. However, that is american.
I phoned Citizens Advice Bureau recently to try and find answer to this, being the parent of son in this situation. Was told that it's a fuzzy area, but a gift is a gift and therefore technically belongs to the recipient ie the girl. However, if the girl returns the ring willingly, then obviously there's no problem. It's a tricky one, with no clear-cut answer. Thankfully my son's situation has been resolved.
I doubt if the police would be interested, since the ring is considered a gift (see the links above). Although tradition plays a part, I don't know whether it'S possible to enforce the tradition.
he (you?) would be the laughing stock of the cop shop. "Eee oop lad, I'll gi yer three carrots fer that."
It is hers - you gave it to her in good faith and, as such, it is a gift. A good percentage of gals do give them back as they want no association with the ex......