ChatterBank0 min ago
Staff Holiday
24 Answers
We have someone at work who never takes all the holiday he is entitled to - he takes two days a year, if that. Just out of interest; should the company insist that he takes his full holiday entitlement?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by legal girl. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Before I retired this year it was a condition at work that we all took at least one holiday per year for at least ten working days, the request came from the Pension Providers of the Company. (Office work) . I guess it depends on the Company he works for , Pension Providers and Health Insurance Company if given.
My Dad is entitled to 8 weeks holiday at BT, but he is lucky if he takes any more than 2 weeks. BT certainly don't demand he takes the full 8 weeks. I wish he would take more time off but he feels, as a director, it's too busy and they have too much on so he can't. It's much the same for his team too.
I agree with chas2008, it may be the person is on some sort of fiddle and is worried that if they are away for any length of time they will be found out.
If they deal with invoices or cash or stuff like that I would ensure they are not on some sort of fiddle.
A friend of mine worked for a company of accountants. The company was owned by the "husband" but the "wife" worked there in an admin role.
The wife decided to leave and a young girl was trained to replace her.
The first Friday after the wife left the young girl said did she need to get £100 out of petty cash to go the Post Office to buy £100 of stamps.
Everybody asked why as their mail was franked.
Turned out the "wife" had been drawing £100 out of petty cash each Friday to "buy stamps" but was actually just keeping the money.
I know £100 is not that much but people can fiddle much higher amounts than that.
If they deal with invoices or cash or stuff like that I would ensure they are not on some sort of fiddle.
A friend of mine worked for a company of accountants. The company was owned by the "husband" but the "wife" worked there in an admin role.
The wife decided to leave and a young girl was trained to replace her.
The first Friday after the wife left the young girl said did she need to get £100 out of petty cash to go the Post Office to buy £100 of stamps.
Everybody asked why as their mail was franked.
Turned out the "wife" had been drawing £100 out of petty cash each Friday to "buy stamps" but was actually just keeping the money.
I know £100 is not that much but people can fiddle much higher amounts than that.
What a terrible lot of cynics we have on here. Someone doesn't take their full holidays per year so the first thought is they must be commiting some sort of fraud! Dear oh dear.
For what it's worth, I don't take my full holidays in a year, though since marrying and having a family I get a lot closer to it than I used to. I can think of at least two other staff in our office who don't get anywhere near taking them all either. I'm not committing any frauds, and I'm pretty sure neither of the other two are either. I even worked Christmas Day morning once because I wanted to finish something before we came back from the Xmas break, though that was long before wife and kids came along.
Perhaps he just doesn't have anything better to do?
For what it's worth, I don't take my full holidays in a year, though since marrying and having a family I get a lot closer to it than I used to. I can think of at least two other staff in our office who don't get anywhere near taking them all either. I'm not committing any frauds, and I'm pretty sure neither of the other two are either. I even worked Christmas Day morning once because I wanted to finish something before we came back from the Xmas break, though that was long before wife and kids came along.
Perhaps he just doesn't have anything better to do?
As a manager it was part of my remit to ensure that those who reported to me where encouraged to take their leave entitlement. This was in part to demonstrate that the organisation had taken adequate steps to ensure that the employee was taking sufficient breaks to restore themselves and to counter any claims of exploitation in the workplace.