ChatterBank0 min ago
Can I Sue After Getting Trapped In A Car Wash (Through No Fault Of My Own)
Can I sue after getting trapped in a car wash, I followed all instructions as given but was stuck, no one came to my assistance and I remained stuck shouting for help. I could not get out of the vehicle as the machine was still active. I called the car wash provider but no-one answered the phone. Eventually I got through to a family member who notified staff. Since this happened I have not been sleeping or eating properly. I get paranoid about getting locked in places and feel trapped in tight places. I have not been able to look at a car wash since
Answers
Contact your local Council and enquire whether this is one for Trading Standards or the HSE.
15:12 Fri 03rd Jan 2014
Potentially you could sue, but is it worth it? You were stuck there for a very short period and haven't really suffered any sort of loss, apart from a bit of emotional distress. I doubt you would be diagnosed with PTSD, so it probably isnt worth it since pi damages for emotional distress are worth peanuts.
"through no fault of my own" - but you were not actually 'trapped' - you just stayed in the car and did not move it - you were in no danger and you are in your car all the time so i dont see how you were trapped
you could have just driven forward or back - or just got out the car - you say the machine stopped - it is only a set of rollers!
the worst that has happened here is that you got held up for half an hour
sounds like someone is just thinking they can spin this out to get some compo
you could have just driven forward or back - or just got out the car - you say the machine stopped - it is only a set of rollers!
the worst that has happened here is that you got held up for half an hour
sounds like someone is just thinking they can spin this out to get some compo
I do think it happens from time to time with some carwashes.
Personally I only experienced a cwash stopping once (thats good considering I use them lots) and it is hard to know whether safe to drive forwards or backwards or get out (you do not plan for this) -and I did panic slightly only because I was going to be late for somerhing.. mine restarted & when I told staff they mentioned they play up from time to time. (I gather they mainly self-run (irregular or remote checks) but I could be wrong).
I never read the instructions!! on the walls and I hate some as like driving on a railway track! Barmaid makes sense.
If you tried to drive forward or backwards, thinking it had stopped - that may have shut it down. Some are really sensitive and do a bit of "thinking" so you believe it has stopped but it hasn't and if you move the car even slightly mid wash, it throws it. I think I did this you see...
No harm in exloring your optons though.
Personally I only experienced a cwash stopping once (thats good considering I use them lots) and it is hard to know whether safe to drive forwards or backwards or get out (you do not plan for this) -and I did panic slightly only because I was going to be late for somerhing.. mine restarted & when I told staff they mentioned they play up from time to time. (I gather they mainly self-run (irregular or remote checks) but I could be wrong).
I never read the instructions!! on the walls and I hate some as like driving on a railway track! Barmaid makes sense.
If you tried to drive forward or backwards, thinking it had stopped - that may have shut it down. Some are really sensitive and do a bit of "thinking" so you believe it has stopped but it hasn't and if you move the car even slightly mid wash, it throws it. I think I did this you see...
No harm in exloring your optons though.
and all this coulda woulda shoulda about if you had got out and got injured is nonsense too - if you were that upset you would have just got out and gone the opposite way to the rollers - that were not moving ...
the machine is designed to have cars going through it - so how would reversing or driving through have damaged your car?
again if you were that scared you would have risked a few scratches to get out!
the machine is designed to have cars going through it - so how would reversing or driving through have damaged your car?
again if you were that scared you would have risked a few scratches to get out!
Barmaid has given the professional lawyer's opinion. I agree.
The defendant has to take as he finds; if you had an unusual sensitivity, such as claustrophobia, it would be no defence, if he were negligent, for him to say that you could only sue for what a healthy person could.
But you were perfectly normal before. You have to prove, by expert medical evidence, including specialists from the defendant's side, that you have a paranoia which is recognised by medical science and that it was caused entirely by negligence of the defendant.
To use a lawyer's expression "Fat chance !". And, as Barmaid says, the damages under this head are minuscule, not worth powder and shot in suing. Also, they are usually tacked on to other claims rather than claimed in their own right; usually some serious injury plus the mental suffering. That's not to say they can't be alone, but when they are they are extremely serious ones, a million miles from your little claim, as yet unproven.
If you want a proper lawyer's expression, try "de minimis non curat lex" (the law is not concerned with trivia ) and "injuria sine damnum" (l wronged but without hurt "
The defendant has to take as he finds; if you had an unusual sensitivity, such as claustrophobia, it would be no defence, if he were negligent, for him to say that you could only sue for what a healthy person could.
But you were perfectly normal before. You have to prove, by expert medical evidence, including specialists from the defendant's side, that you have a paranoia which is recognised by medical science and that it was caused entirely by negligence of the defendant.
To use a lawyer's expression "Fat chance !". And, as Barmaid says, the damages under this head are minuscule, not worth powder and shot in suing. Also, they are usually tacked on to other claims rather than claimed in their own right; usually some serious injury plus the mental suffering. That's not to say they can't be alone, but when they are they are extremely serious ones, a million miles from your little claim, as yet unproven.
If you want a proper lawyer's expression, try "de minimis non curat lex" (the law is not concerned with trivia ) and "injuria sine damnum" (l wronged but without hurt "
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.