ChatterBank6 mins ago
Top Gear Producer Oisin Tymon Will Not Press Charges Against Jeremy Clarkson
I'm puzzled. I thought that in the UK, it wasn't up to the victim whether or not charges were pressed.
I thought it was up to the police and the CPS?
I thought it was up to the police and the CPS?
Answers
Yes it is not within Mr Tymon's gift to decide whether or not charges are brought. The CPS has to conduct its two part test before making a charging decision: 1. Is there sufficient evidence to secure a reasonable chance of a conviction and 2. Is it in the public interest to proceed. As hc has pointed out, it is not necessary for the alleged victim to make a...
18:12 Fri 27th Mar 2015
Unless the law has changed in the last few years it was the victim who signed the charge sheet and invited to make a statement. EG Police are called to a supermarket to interview an alleged shoplifter.The store detective gives his account to the police in presence and hearing of the accused.If sufficient evidence is shown to arrest for theft then the store detective is asked if he/she will be willing to attend the police station,sign the charge sheet and write a statement.The theft was NOT witnessed by the police officer but he is the one who has the power of arrest.If the offence was witnessed by a police officer then he would sign the charge sheet.That was how it used to work 20 years ago .
Yeah I am a bit confused
this section is full of threads where someone says I wanna withdraw my statement and the advice is too late chummy
The CPS has decided.....
People will know I am not the CPS' or Alison Saunders' greatest fan
and you also know what the Red Queen said to Alice
Jam tomorrow, jam yesterday and no jam today !
[ oops sorry for those trained not to follow similes and metaphors the parallel is - "you can with draw charges today but you couldnt yesterday and wont be able to tomorrow". Retrocop will confirm I have always found police procedure like Alice in Wonderland - with the P'lice being Alice rather than myself ]
this section is full of threads where someone says I wanna withdraw my statement and the advice is too late chummy
The CPS has decided.....
People will know I am not the CPS' or Alison Saunders' greatest fan
and you also know what the Red Queen said to Alice
Jam tomorrow, jam yesterday and no jam today !
[ oops sorry for those trained not to follow similes and metaphors the parallel is - "you can with draw charges today but you couldnt yesterday and wont be able to tomorrow". Retrocop will confirm I have always found police procedure like Alice in Wonderland - with the P'lice being Alice rather than myself ]
In the recent past a man was prosecuted for assault that was witnessed on CCTV camera even though the victim never made a complaint.
In R v Brown (again) there were multiple convictions for various assault offences even though there were no victims - everyone consented and refused to make a complaint.
The police just need evidence that a crime took place.
In R v Brown (again) there were multiple convictions for various assault offences even though there were no victims - everyone consented and refused to make a complaint.
The police just need evidence that a crime took place.
Yes it is not within Mr Tymon's gift to decide whether or not charges are brought. The CPS has to conduct its two part test before making a charging decision: 1. Is there sufficient evidence to secure a reasonable chance of a conviction and 2. Is it in the public interest to proceed.
As hc has pointed out, it is not necessary for the alleged victim to make a complaint and the case he cites makes it clear than a victim cannot give his consent to being assaulted.
As hc has pointed out, it is not necessary for the alleged victim to make a complaint and the case he cites makes it clear than a victim cannot give his consent to being assaulted.
In domestic violence cases, the main reason that cases proced without the victims co-operation is that in that situation the victim is very often bullied or
frightened into a withdrawal. Usuallyit is a woman who has to continue living with the man who assulted her until the trial. They are commonly threatend with more violence unless they drop charges, so the desision is taken out of their hands. That is not likedly to happen in this case. It
frightened into a withdrawal. Usuallyit is a woman who has to continue living with the man who assulted her until the trial. They are commonly threatend with more violence unless they drop charges, so the desision is taken out of their hands. That is not likedly to happen in this case. It
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.