Bliss Roots Cbd Gummies™ Exclusive...
Food & Drink18 mins ago
Under 18's Serving In A Pub
45 Answers
paid cash in hand now been asked to pay back earnings because of claiming benefit? does the employer have the right to do this?
Answers
Chris....get real! What authorised person has the time? Very few. That's why few pubs employ under 18's to serve in the bar. “There's no law saying an employer can't pay cash in hand…” If an employer has any employees that earn more than £116 per week he must register for PAYE. Having registered he must make the appropriate deductions in income tax and...
20:03 Sun 03rd Mar 2019
Your Granddaughter has done the work, so can expect to be paid. If the pub decided to give her cash in hand,they cannot reasonably expect that money to be paid back at a later date.
They might have asked for a receipt at the time of payment (but presumably didn’t) or they retrospectively may ask her to provide an invoice for her work done (but she doesn’t have to provide one).
The pub have nil prospect of recovering this money, because there is no paperwork to prove your Grand Daughter was given it. She is not compelled to give it back, and the pub cannot take her to Court for none payment.
A bit of a mess, and pretty amateur business on the pubs part.
They might have asked for a receipt at the time of payment (but presumably didn’t) or they retrospectively may ask her to provide an invoice for her work done (but she doesn’t have to provide one).
The pub have nil prospect of recovering this money, because there is no paperwork to prove your Grand Daughter was given it. She is not compelled to give it back, and the pub cannot take her to Court for none payment.
A bit of a mess, and pretty amateur business on the pubs part.
My brother as an employer was in this position and it didnt occur to him to get repaid - and then she wasnt employed, geddit?
Presumably both parties are being investigated - and the employer unsurprisingly wants to limit losses and see this as a way out. However he will still get the investigation and the men from the ministry poking their noses into ALL his affairs
The grand daughter is gonna lose her job - who works for nothing and will still get the investigation from her side - santioned or whatever.
Rule 100 is where a landlord can have rent clawed back from other tenants accounts - and as far as I know, there is no parallel in employment law. that is the employer saying "gimme gimme - you on the dole!" - it would enable/empower slavery wouldnt it?
Presumably both parties are being investigated - and the employer unsurprisingly wants to limit losses and see this as a way out. However he will still get the investigation and the men from the ministry poking their noses into ALL his affairs
The grand daughter is gonna lose her job - who works for nothing and will still get the investigation from her side - santioned or whatever.
Rule 100 is where a landlord can have rent clawed back from other tenants accounts - and as far as I know, there is no parallel in employment law. that is the employer saying "gimme gimme - you on the dole!" - it would enable/empower slavery wouldnt it?
