He's Already Talking About A 3Rd Term.
News2 mins ago
Extracontractual Liability
A pedestrian walking by a construction site is struck by a brick which has apparently fallen from a raised platform. After treatment, he returns to the scene to challenge those responsible but is met with denials. Explain fully how the concept of extra contractual liability might assist him in obtaining financial compensation under the rules of delict
Answers
1 to 12 of 12
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mekides. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The terminology in your question suggests that you might be in the USA or perhaps in an African nation. In the UK (other, possibly, than in Scotland) I'd have expected to see a reference to 'tort', rather than to 'delict'. If so, this clearly isn't the place to be asking your question, as our laws are very different to yours.
Further, we're not too keen on directly answering coursework questions for people. Your first starting point though should be to look up (or google) the definition of 'delict' in your own jurisdiction. (In the USA you'll need to consult references to State law, rather than to Federal law). It will almost certainly include some form of reference to 'negligence', which looks like being a key factor in your argument but you need to find out what else is needed within your state's/country's legal system to show that someone is 'delictually liable'. Here, for example is clear a statement of the 5 factors necessary in South Africa but they might well be different where you are:
http://
Further, we're not too keen on directly answering coursework questions for people. Your first starting point though should be to look up (or google) the definition of 'delict' in your own jurisdiction. (In the USA you'll need to consult references to State law, rather than to Federal law). It will almost certainly include some form of reference to 'negligence', which looks like being a key factor in your argument but you need to find out what else is needed within your state's/country's legal system to show that someone is 'delictually liable'. Here, for example is clear a statement of the 5 factors necessary in South Africa but they might well be different where you are:
http://
If it's Scots law, Mekides should start here:
https:/
https:/
and the rules of delict are
The basic elements of delict are conduct, wrongfulness, fault, causation and damage. As a starting point, it is essential to realise that all five elements mentioned above must be present before a person can be set to be delictually liable.
I was a bit put off by extra contractual - - -
there isobviously no contract ....
The basic elements of delict are conduct, wrongfulness, fault, causation and damage. As a starting point, it is essential to realise that all five elements mentioned above must be present before a person can be set to be delictually liable.
I was a bit put off by extra contractual - - -
there isobviously no contract ....
1 to 12 of 12
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.