Gaming20 mins ago
Rules On The Legal Liabilities Of A Website
Could someone with sound legal knowledge give advice if the following is correct
UK law concerning Legal liability of forum and web-site operators in the UK
"When an action for defamation is brought against the operator of a forum or a website in respect of a statement posted on their website, and the website operators are unwilling to respond positively to at least one of these requests, the operator might lose their automatic defence, which means, the website operator could be held liable for defamation for the third party post. Upon receiving a formal notice of the complaint by the victim of the defamation, the website operator must, within 48 hours send a copy of the notice of complaint to the poster asking the poster for permission to either delete their post or provide their details to the defamation victim"
Also what counts as a formal notice of complaint. does an email count. Thankyou.
UK law concerning Legal liability of forum and web-site operators in the UK
"When an action for defamation is brought against the operator of a forum or a website in respect of a statement posted on their website, and the website operators are unwilling to respond positively to at least one of these requests, the operator might lose their automatic defence, which means, the website operator could be held liable for defamation for the third party post. Upon receiving a formal notice of the complaint by the victim of the defamation, the website operator must, within 48 hours send a copy of the notice of complaint to the poster asking the poster for permission to either delete their post or provide their details to the defamation victim"
Also what counts as a formal notice of complaint. does an email count. Thankyou.
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AuntPG. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The website you've quoted from (which is here, for anyone else with an interest in this thread https:/
Information about what constitutes a formal notice of complaint can be found here:
https:/
Some practicalities need to be noted here though:
Firstly, for an action for defamation to succeed in the courts, there is a need for the claimant to prove that it has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to his/her reputation. [Section 1(1), Defamation Act 2013]. A statement might be totally untrue and utterly malicious but, as far as the law is concerned, it's not automatically defamatory. The 'serious harm' test, which was introduced by the 2013 Act, is quite a stringent one and many attempts to prove defamation, which might previously have succeeded, are now likely to fall at that hurdle.
Secondly, there's no legal aid for defamation cases. The reality is that it's impossible to sue for defamation unless you've got (and are prepared to risk) at least a five-figure sum in your bank account. (The only exception here might be when someone else is prepared to take a case on, on behalf of the claimant. An example might be a teaching union who're prepared to back an action by one of their members against a parent who has made a defamatory statement which could prove detrimental to that teacher's career).
Information about what constitutes a formal notice of complaint can be found here:
https:/
Some practicalities need to be noted here though:
Firstly, for an action for defamation to succeed in the courts, there is a need for the claimant to prove that it has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to his/her reputation. [Section 1(1), Defamation Act 2013]. A statement might be totally untrue and utterly malicious but, as far as the law is concerned, it's not automatically defamatory. The 'serious harm' test, which was introduced by the 2013 Act, is quite a stringent one and many attempts to prove defamation, which might previously have succeeded, are now likely to fall at that hurdle.
Secondly, there's no legal aid for defamation cases. The reality is that it's impossible to sue for defamation unless you've got (and are prepared to risk) at least a five-figure sum in your bank account. (The only exception here might be when someone else is prepared to take a case on, on behalf of the claimant. An example might be a teaching union who're prepared to back an action by one of their members against a parent who has made a defamatory statement which could prove detrimental to that teacher's career).
-- answer removed --
1 to 11 of 11
Latest Posts
ChatterBank21 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles23 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles31 mins ago
I Am Supposed To To What I Am Told
Body & Soul38 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.