ChatterBank20 mins ago
Speeding ticket!
I was caught by a speed camera a couple of weeks ago, and, whilst I hold my hands up and accept that I did exceed the speed limit, I can't understand the fact that the police don't have to supply evidence of the offence unless I go to court. If I did go to court, it would cost me more. Is this why they do it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kathyan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You answered the question yourself - you know that you were speeding. I can never understand why people make a fuss about this, most people know that they were exceeding the speed limit yet some insist on seeing the proof of what they already know
If you refuse to accept what you know to be true and require the prosecution to prove it then yes you will end up paying more costs.
No-one likes getting done for speeding least of all me but just accept it take your 3 points and �60 fine and be more careful next time
If you refuse to accept what you know to be true and require the prosecution to prove it then yes you will end up paying more costs.
No-one likes getting done for speeding least of all me but just accept it take your 3 points and �60 fine and be more careful next time
-- answer removed --
Seatrout, as I said, I'm not disputing the fact that I was speeding and I'm not trying to 'get out of it'. All I want to know is why you are not allowed to see the evidence unless it goes to court. I will pay the fine and accept that I did wrong and yes I have learned a lesson so I don't need a lecture, thank you.
Have a look on here http://www.pepipoo.com/