Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Consumer Credit Act 1974
Ok, question for you all;
My car is on finance frm Peugeot and I have approx 11 months left on the finance. I have been paying my installments regularly as i am bound to in the Agreement. I recently found out that Peugeot had been trying to take funds from an old bank account that my husband and I havnt used in well over a year and we had cancelled the direct debit. However, it has since appeared that despite me paying regular installements, they have been trying to take the same amount out of the old account which has resulted in charges both from the bank and peugeot. This has now been rectified on the banks half but the problem is this - since trying to change my installment date (this has now been done since Nov) peugeot are now asking for two payments monthly, one on my original payment date (15th) and now for the date that i have changed to (21st) Surely this cannot be right?! I have disputed this over the phone to them and have now recieved a default notice for �278. Where do i stand with this in order to write them a seriously snotty letter and maintain my once a month regular payment?? Thanks for any advice.
My car is on finance frm Peugeot and I have approx 11 months left on the finance. I have been paying my installments regularly as i am bound to in the Agreement. I recently found out that Peugeot had been trying to take funds from an old bank account that my husband and I havnt used in well over a year and we had cancelled the direct debit. However, it has since appeared that despite me paying regular installements, they have been trying to take the same amount out of the old account which has resulted in charges both from the bank and peugeot. This has now been rectified on the banks half but the problem is this - since trying to change my installment date (this has now been done since Nov) peugeot are now asking for two payments monthly, one on my original payment date (15th) and now for the date that i have changed to (21st) Surely this cannot be right?! I have disputed this over the phone to them and have now recieved a default notice for �278. Where do i stand with this in order to write them a seriously snotty letter and maintain my once a month regular payment?? Thanks for any advice.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Student2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
We asked the bank to investigate and it appeared that Peugeot set up another direct debit off their own back with out my or my husbands consent (AUDDIS) but yes only the one signed DD and then it was cancelled and the bank acknowledge that. They are quoting me S87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act saying that i am in breach of my payments - but i am paying exactly what i have been doing for 5 years. The arrears are the second payment that they are after.
This is an administration error on the finance company's side.
Get all your old bank statements and make a list of all payments to them, noting the date and the amount.
Send this by registered post to the company and in the meantime telephone them with the same information. Ask them which month(s) they have not received payment -and you can prove they have.
Get all your old bank statements and make a list of all payments to them, noting the date and the amount.
Send this by registered post to the company and in the meantime telephone them with the same information. Ask them which month(s) they have not received payment -and you can prove they have.
Thank you - yes thats exactly what i am doing, bank statements, letter from the bank, all sorts but they wont admit that its an admin error (of course they wouldn't) but sending me a default notice etc is worrying. I was thinking of mentioning in my letter that i am on an IVA in the hope that they back off. But i am in the right and its their problem not mine.
lol - i swear Peugeot have caused me no end of trouble throughout the years and i am always having to prove them wrong. I got �50 bank charges off them after kicking up a stink and now they want more cash off me! I do have rather alot of correspondance in my favour tho
They say "The provisions of the agreement provide that you must pay us the rentals (�194) due thereunder promptly on their due dates. You have breached those provisions..." Now what the failed to say is that the payment date is when the money has to reach them - not the date you pay, in that instance they may have a case but i am still making the required payments on the required day meaning they get the payment maybe 2/3 days after (yup more charges!)
They say "The provisions of the agreement provide that you must pay us the rentals (�194) due thereunder promptly on their due dates. You have breached those provisions..." Now what the failed to say is that the payment date is when the money has to reach them - not the date you pay, in that instance they may have a case but i am still making the required payments on the required day meaning they get the payment maybe 2/3 days after (yup more charges!)