Home & Garden13 mins ago
my policies to sort this country out
1) sort the laptop to underpriviledged families out (one per household and security on them so you can't go on websites such as facebook and youtube)
2) if foreingers comit a crime in the UK they'll be sent home or if criminals try and come into the UK they won't be allowed
3) If you get sentenced to prison, you do your full sentence, unless youre somehow proven inocent
4) somehow you'll be checked on to see if you're actually disabled ect so that you can't work and can claim benefits.
5) Advertising of alcohol will be banned and i'll keep the forcoming minimum price per unit
6) MPs won't be able to claim money back at all, their wages are high enough so that they should be able to pay for their own food ect.
that's all i can think up at the moment and will come back with more
feel free to comment
2) if foreingers comit a crime in the UK they'll be sent home or if criminals try and come into the UK they won't be allowed
3) If you get sentenced to prison, you do your full sentence, unless youre somehow proven inocent
4) somehow you'll be checked on to see if you're actually disabled ect so that you can't work and can claim benefits.
5) Advertising of alcohol will be banned and i'll keep the forcoming minimum price per unit
6) MPs won't be able to claim money back at all, their wages are high enough so that they should be able to pay for their own food ect.
that's all i can think up at the moment and will come back with more
feel free to comment
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No 3 'Full sentence' There's a practical reason why we've always had full sentence not being full sentence. It's to keep the prisoner reasonably well-behaved inside.He could suffer some loss of remission for any misbehaviour. He knows that. That's easier than a system of full sentence plus more later for causing trouble, as and when.
Judges know, when they pass sentence, what the minimum time served will be and sentence accordingly.It's only the public who don't seem to appreciate that (but it gives the Daily Mail some copy !)
Judges know, when they pass sentence, what the minimum time served will be and sentence accordingly.It's only the public who don't seem to appreciate that (but it gives the Daily Mail some copy !)
Foreigners who commit crimes with a penalty over a certain level are already repatriated unless you want to send my wife back to ireland for a speeding ticket!
A sentence does not mean prison - you can be sentenced to community service or a fine.
There is something called a "Tarrif" which is the minimum someone serves.
We could change the name of the tarrif to "sentence" and create a new word for the overall punishment - would that help?
I love the word "somehow" in 4) - cases are already investigated - perhaps you just want to employ more investigators.
These seem very poorly thought out - I guess you are David Cameron
A sentence does not mean prison - you can be sentenced to community service or a fine.
There is something called a "Tarrif" which is the minimum someone serves.
We could change the name of the tarrif to "sentence" and create a new word for the overall punishment - would that help?
I love the word "somehow" in 4) - cases are already investigated - perhaps you just want to employ more investigators.
These seem very poorly thought out - I guess you are David Cameron
Well it's just that 2 and 4 are already in place and 3 is just a (Common) misunderstanding of what a sentence is.
6 is interesting - I think you should see that an MP representing the North or Scotland needs to do a lot more travelling if you do that the only MPs will be rich already
Rich MPs generally don't always represent people well.
5) I like - but I'm Teetotal so Im'm biased
As for 1 - exactly who is going to decide which websites are suitable for the poor and which are not? A new censor? perhaps you could extend it to books and magazines. You could stop people spending their dole on newspapers too! well apart from ones you approve of - they need to stay informed.
Follow this down the path and what you're saying is that anybody who accepts state benefits must have middle class values and think like me.
It's a rather dangerous road
6 is interesting - I think you should see that an MP representing the North or Scotland needs to do a lot more travelling if you do that the only MPs will be rich already
Rich MPs generally don't always represent people well.
5) I like - but I'm Teetotal so Im'm biased
As for 1 - exactly who is going to decide which websites are suitable for the poor and which are not? A new censor? perhaps you could extend it to books and magazines. You could stop people spending their dole on newspapers too! well apart from ones you approve of - they need to stay informed.
Follow this down the path and what you're saying is that anybody who accepts state benefits must have middle class values and think like me.
It's a rather dangerous road
I don't knock people who have to live on the benefit system if they
are genuine but I know of people who claim and work , and they do
it as a job .The fraud investigators take ages to get a case in to court
due to human rights , race issues , religion , the list is endless ...
but good old England , open door too all , but can't look after there
own elderly .
are genuine but I know of people who claim and work , and they do
it as a job .The fraud investigators take ages to get a case in to court
due to human rights , race issues , religion , the list is endless ...
but good old England , open door too all , but can't look after there
own elderly .
I would cut all benifits, except those to the people that are truely incapable of earning a living, so that working has more benifits than not.
I have had a couple of people turn down jobs because in thier eyes they would be working for 'only' £16. The benifits they get are so great why bother getting a job? and that is only 16hrs a week.
I think if they are offered a job if they don't take it they should get some benifits stopped.
I have had a couple of people turn down jobs because in thier eyes they would be working for 'only' £16. The benifits they get are so great why bother getting a job? and that is only 16hrs a week.
I think if they are offered a job if they don't take it they should get some benifits stopped.