Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Copyright, IP, intranet and links
I'm trying to get to the bottom of copyright and IP laws when it comes to linking to websites from an intranet site. For instance, an intranet often hosts a daily news summary showing articles of interest to a staff base. I'm getting mixed messages with regard to whether or not it is possible to create a hyperlink from the headline of this summary on an intranet page to the full article on the website of the media in which it appears. The hyperlink would open a new browser window and therefore the article would be viewed on the media's website, and not as a part of the intranet. I'm trying to get to the bottom as to whether or not such links constitute a breach of copyright. The article is not being reproduced in any way, simply accessed. Can anyone shed any light on this please? Thanks!
Answers
1 to 3 of 3
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by snlk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There are some issues to consider here.
1) You could be seen to be diluting another's trademark. Dilution is seen as the "death of a thousand cuts", whereby one small encroachment repeated many times over can harm another's effective trademark. However, I consider this only to be a realistic argument when you use a trademark in the hyperlink itself. As Chris' link shows, there are yet to be any cases concluded on the matter.
2) Passing Off: A subsidiary of trademarks, this is where you attempt to pass of your goods (here a website) as that of a competitor. It's perhaps unlikely if you're linking to their genuine site.
3) Reverse Passing Off: This is the biggie. It's where you hold out your goods as belonging to/being part of a competitor's when in fact they are not. There is an argument that by linking their page to yours, that's what you're doing.
Currently, there is no legal barrier stopping you, only the threat of action from the other party. You should include a disclaimer that the link is one of an external site that is not under your control (this will also indemnify you against inappropriate content). If I were acting for you, I would argue that you are not using the link "in the course of trade", which is necessary for a trademark infringement. There is no potential for copyright infringement here, for as you say, you are not copying it.
I know I've not backed up my answer legally, but I do have a postgrad qualification in IP and have experience in the area. To put this into perspective, see how the BBC do it on a daily basis. Never a hint on an infringement here!: http://news.bbc.co.uk...transfers/8685915.stm
1) You could be seen to be diluting another's trademark. Dilution is seen as the "death of a thousand cuts", whereby one small encroachment repeated many times over can harm another's effective trademark. However, I consider this only to be a realistic argument when you use a trademark in the hyperlink itself. As Chris' link shows, there are yet to be any cases concluded on the matter.
2) Passing Off: A subsidiary of trademarks, this is where you attempt to pass of your goods (here a website) as that of a competitor. It's perhaps unlikely if you're linking to their genuine site.
3) Reverse Passing Off: This is the biggie. It's where you hold out your goods as belonging to/being part of a competitor's when in fact they are not. There is an argument that by linking their page to yours, that's what you're doing.
Currently, there is no legal barrier stopping you, only the threat of action from the other party. You should include a disclaimer that the link is one of an external site that is not under your control (this will also indemnify you against inappropriate content). If I were acting for you, I would argue that you are not using the link "in the course of trade", which is necessary for a trademark infringement. There is no potential for copyright infringement here, for as you say, you are not copying it.
I know I've not backed up my answer legally, but I do have a postgrad qualification in IP and have experience in the area. To put this into perspective, see how the BBC do it on a daily basis. Never a hint on an infringement here!: http://news.bbc.co.uk...transfers/8685915.stm
1 to 3 of 3
Latest Posts
Spam & Scams6 mins ago
Reeves Is Now After Your Pension Funds
News19 mins ago
Editor's Blog45 mins ago
Body & Soul47 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.