News3 mins ago
Reality Tv Shows
22 Answers
so many, so little to choose from, i am bored senseless by the tv trivia that's on, i confess that i have almost stopped watching tv, and resort to the ever dependable old films, a few class dvd drama series, but this idea that many people like to watch shows on hairdressing, sewing bee, is beyond me.
Answers
Listening to the radio here, can't stand reality programmes.
19:37 Sat 08th Mar 2014
Sorry, emmie, but I enjoy the Sewing Bee (apart from Claudia Winkleman). The two experts encourage as well as criticise, they don't talk down to viewers, they know what they're talking about, they give useful information, and it's fascinating to see what the participants come up with at the end of quite a short period of time. It's obviously for a limited audience, but that's what BBC2 is for.
Fair doe's to each her/his own, but like others on here I don't like the choices we are offered. Would it not be possible for the BBC ( chosen for lack of advertising) to have special channels for cooking,drama,talent shows,soaps etc, so that we can all choose our very own favourite TV shows to watch ?
I believe zebo has the nail on the head. Reality TV is cheaper to make generally. The shows that feature so called celebrities must cost less unless they do it free, which is highly unlikely.
Chasing coppers doing their job, emergency rescue services, bailiffs, heir hunters, cooks, dancing, ice skating, singing, house hunters or builders etc, etc, etc probably come cheaper but once you've seen one they quickly become repetitive and boring.
I record a lot of stuff which looks interesting. This has the added benefit of fast forwarding through any annoying adverts. If the programme turns out to be rubbish the delete button quickly gets rid of it.
The one exception, if it classes as a reality show, I thought Sunday's Top Gear was hilarious. The team were tasked with the job of building a bridge over the River Kwai in Thailand. First off they had to drive three clapped out old trucks 1200 miles from Rangoon across Burma(they refused to call it Myanmar) into Thailand to the river. Next weeks episode is the bridge building.
Chasing coppers doing their job, emergency rescue services, bailiffs, heir hunters, cooks, dancing, ice skating, singing, house hunters or builders etc, etc, etc probably come cheaper but once you've seen one they quickly become repetitive and boring.
I record a lot of stuff which looks interesting. This has the added benefit of fast forwarding through any annoying adverts. If the programme turns out to be rubbish the delete button quickly gets rid of it.
The one exception, if it classes as a reality show, I thought Sunday's Top Gear was hilarious. The team were tasked with the job of building a bridge over the River Kwai in Thailand. First off they had to drive three clapped out old trucks 1200 miles from Rangoon across Burma(they refused to call it Myanmar) into Thailand to the river. Next weeks episode is the bridge building.
zebo is absolutely right.
The ratio of production costs versus viewer ineterest - which translates into advertising revenue - makes reality TV a total winner for TV companies.
Dramas are extremely expensive, and unless they are assured good foreign sales, it's simply not worth investing in making them.
If this makes it sound as though TV is produced more to make money than for entertainment, than that is because it is!
If entertainment is a by-product, then fine, but it's not the driving force.
The ratio of production costs versus viewer ineterest - which translates into advertising revenue - makes reality TV a total winner for TV companies.
Dramas are extremely expensive, and unless they are assured good foreign sales, it's simply not worth investing in making them.
If this makes it sound as though TV is produced more to make money than for entertainment, than that is because it is!
If entertainment is a by-product, then fine, but it's not the driving force.