.Let us remember that this is the Crown's case,
and it sounds pretty damning because the barrister for the Crown is paid to make that effect.
The defence of course - since HE is paid to defend will say on the other hand....
The Prosecution is going for something called the Similar Evidence rule in which one is allowed under certain circumstances to take five people's evidence, all of whom dont have the whole picture and to use the jig-saw pieces from each persons evidence, to build up the whole picture.
The defence calls this - making evidence up. Basically the missing bits of the jigsaw, you are allowed to make up - that is import from the others' evidence.