Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Should He Have Been Sacked?
53 Answers
The actor who plays Shariff in Corrie has been sacked for making racist tweets, do you think this deserves instant dismissal?
http:// www.msn .com/en -gb/ent ertainm ent/cel ebrity/ coronat ion-str eet-sta r-marc- anwar-s acked-f rom-soa p-after -astoni shing-r acist-t witter- attack/ ar-BBwA QxA?li= BBoPWjQ
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Barsel. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
When other things have happened with the actors in Corrie, e.g Michael LeVell (sp?), there were cries of, 'I'm not watching Corrie again, and if he comes back, I won't watch it again. So I was wondering if they hadn't sacked Marc Anwar would people be saying this again apart from our Indian community. I don't think they had any other choice really because of how his fellow actors would react to him.
//you may be happy to employ someone who not only thinks like that but puts it out to the world//
"Thinks like that", Mamya? Are you saying that people who have unpleasant opinions should be barred from employment? That's not going to do a lot of good for the unemployement stats, you know.
As for "out to the world", who apart from his mates or a professional hate-speech hunter would be reading this rant? It was a tweet, wasn't it? But supposing an "Indian" (I think he meant Hindu given the fact that the rant seems to have been inspired by recent deaths in the disputed Kashmir territory) did stumble on the tweet. So what? Why would any grown-up waste a second of his time in order to take "offence" at a piece of nonsense?
As for hate speech, well, you can ban speech, but you can't ban hate. It has been argued, rightly or wrongly, that banning such speech is likely to increase hate. Wasn't Mr. H banged up for breaking the Weimar republic's hate speech laws?
"Thinks like that", Mamya? Are you saying that people who have unpleasant opinions should be barred from employment? That's not going to do a lot of good for the unemployement stats, you know.
As for "out to the world", who apart from his mates or a professional hate-speech hunter would be reading this rant? It was a tweet, wasn't it? But supposing an "Indian" (I think he meant Hindu given the fact that the rant seems to have been inspired by recent deaths in the disputed Kashmir territory) did stumble on the tweet. So what? Why would any grown-up waste a second of his time in order to take "offence" at a piece of nonsense?
As for hate speech, well, you can ban speech, but you can't ban hate. It has been argued, rightly or wrongly, that banning such speech is likely to increase hate. Wasn't Mr. H banged up for breaking the Weimar republic's hate speech laws?
I perhaps should have put the 'World' in inverted commas, however when you publish something on the internet you are effectively making it available to everyone.
Re his anger, that he is entitled to but I feel you should be able to express your disgust, horror and shock at situations without resorting to such speech (however 'asterisk' hidden it is).
Re his anger, that he is entitled to but I feel you should be able to express your disgust, horror and shock at situations without resorting to such speech (however 'asterisk' hidden it is).