ChatterBank0 min ago
Innocent Until Proven Guilty?
63 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-50 27757/C oronati on-Stre et-Brun o-Langl ey-sack ed-assa ult-cla im.html
A man's career in shreds just on the words of one female. Bill Roach and Michael Le Vell both made a come back after certain accusations, were Coro to quick to sack Bruno?
A man's career in shreds just on the words of one female. Bill Roach and Michael Le Vell both made a come back after certain accusations, were Coro to quick to sack Bruno?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.they were more forgiving of Len Fairclough, and perhaps they shouldn't have been
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/obi tuaries /138213 6/Peter -Adamso n.html
Caran, it says his contract was terminated; I'm not sure that's the same as running out. They say they conducted their own inquiries. It seems unfair on the face of it but there's almost certainly stuff we don't know.
http://
Caran, it says his contract was terminated; I'm not sure that's the same as running out. They say they conducted their own inquiries. It seems unfair on the face of it but there's almost certainly stuff we don't know.
I am not a Corrie fan but surely anyone under suspicion of breaking the law should trot off on gardening leave until the case is proved one way or another...it is not up to an employer to decide guilt. Having said this perhaps he told his bosses that he had assaulted the woman concerned and they acted accordingly...
-- answer removed --
When I first read the news report I got the impression that the woman involved had complained directly to Coronation St bosses and that the alleged incident occurred within the last few days.
It now transpires that the matter was reported to the police on the 1st October so maybe his bosses didn't react as quickly as I thought
It now transpires that the matter was reported to the police on the 1st October so maybe his bosses didn't react as quickly as I thought
If the actor's contract is up for renewal, then of course the company is under no obligation to take up their option.
However, I have read the word 'terminated' in the media which suggests that he was under contract, and Granada have dismissed him.
I am quite sure that there is more to the story than is apparent from AOG's question - were it simply the word of one individual that would quite correctly be seen as unfair.
However, Granada are not stupid, and their lawyers will have advised them in advance that the termination will stick.
That coupled with an apparent absence of righteous anger and claims to be innocent, and looking for a day in court on behalf of the actor in question, he appears to be accepting his fate without question, which does infer that he regards fighting it as being against his best interests.
However, I have read the word 'terminated' in the media which suggests that he was under contract, and Granada have dismissed him.
I am quite sure that there is more to the story than is apparent from AOG's question - were it simply the word of one individual that would quite correctly be seen as unfair.
However, Granada are not stupid, and their lawyers will have advised them in advance that the termination will stick.
That coupled with an apparent absence of righteous anger and claims to be innocent, and looking for a day in court on behalf of the actor in question, he appears to be accepting his fate without question, which does infer that he regards fighting it as being against his best interests.