Nick Knowles

[vernonk]

Should he be suspended, if not banned, for this? https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/5434114/nick-knowles-wife-jessica-rose-moor-school-fees/
I know it’s only her word against his, but aren’t most of the other cases?

[johnk]

Do you really believe what the Sun says!!?

[murraymints]

Always 2 sides to a story..usual celebrity domestic confrontations...yawn....

[vernonk]

It’s not just in The Sun. It’s in all the tabloids. The brief claims his ex makes in this statement suggests to me that there is a mega tabloid exclusive up for grabs, and if Knowles can’t stop that or prove it to be false maybe it could be career over. Yes there should always be more than one side to a story, but look how many celebs have been arrested, banned, exposed etc on the basis of accusations before they’ve had a chance to prove their innocence

[vernonk]

I can’t help but wonder if that’s what his ex is seeking: do as I want or I will jeopardise your career

[dannyk13]

Unless an actual crime is committed then a celebrity's private life is nothing to do with his public persona.

[Old_Geezer]

For goodness sake. What has divorce spats got to do with a presenting career.

[cassa333]

Suspended for what?

There is no law, as far as I am aware, stopping someone being an ass in thier divorce and renaming on long held plans.

Although using his son in this way makes him an utter *** as far as I am concerned it is no different to any number of arrogant and often controlling men.

He might have said he won't pay legal fees but isn't that up to a judge to decide? And in any case she could site 'gaslighting', with the requisite proof or backup, and any judge worth thier salt will see through these tactics.

[NoMercy]

There are 2 sides to every story and she may not be a paragon of virtue herself.

I wonder in any case what first attracted her to the millionaire twice her age?

[naomi24]

Suspended or banned from what? His private life is private.

[woofgang]

If I were her, I would feel embarrassed to air my private affairs in public.

[naomi24]

^Me too.

[vernonk]

In her statement, the ex alleges “years of abuse and bullying”.

[naomi24]

Still don't know what he should be suspended or banned from - or why.

[Zacs-Master]

She would say that tho, wouldn’t she.

[Hopkirk]

She claims years of abuse, but only married him three years ago.

What a terrible crime also, not to send a 3 year old child to a public school.

[Ratty2E]

Sounds like a lot of nonsense to me and someone making a fuss to get a bit of media attention. This child is only 3, I'm not sure not being able to go to private school is going to ruin his life.

[Baldric]

What on Earth has a Spat with his ex-wife got to do with his employers?
You need to turn your TV off for a while a try and reconnect with the the real World going by this, and previous posts you have made.

[pastafreak]

And how many other men...or women for that matter...should be suspended, fired, blacklisted...for being idiots in their marriage? Unfortunately it's all too common behaviour...but it should be kept private....unless crimes have been committed. Which I doubt have.

[anotheoldgit]

Why should he pay to send his child to a private school, the child is only three years old.

If she so desires to get the 3 year old out the way, send him to nursery, then when he is older send him to private school, she will be able to afford it with the huge divorce settlement she will obviously receive.

[Garaman]

Nobody should be suspended or banned from anything on someone else's word. Sadly it is happening though.