Is Labour Starting To Abolish Democracy...
News1 min ago
Meghan Agt
53 Answers
https:/
Answers
I think they're quite interesting. Like watching a slow motion car crash. You post whatever you like, Blip. (Like Mozz does)
07:28 Fri 25th Sep 2020
You may be surprised at what I'm going to say, and you may not agree, but I'm going to say it anyway.MM got involved with this because she wanted to highlight that this 'man of colour' was falsely accused of rape. If she hadn't got involved, I for one would know nothing about it, but this is her way of bringing her beliefs to a lot more people. If he had been a white man, she would not have done what she did. If he had been a man of colour but had never had a criminal record, she would not have brought this to our attention. Sorry, but I just had to say what I believe is the truth.
Theblip - // Let's not forget this is a little-known actress who succeeded in seducing a prince. //
You are assuming that the popular media perception is based on facts.
In at least one instance it is not - Ms Markle was not a 'little known actress' - she was a major character player in the US drama series Suits which ran from 2011 - 2019 - 134 episodes, and she was in 108 of them, giving her a high profile and and eight-figure bank balance.
The wording of the phrase 'succeeded in seducing a prince ... ' infers that she was successful where loads of other desperate women failed, and she was the desperate woman who succeeded, and it was the ticket out of her boring drab poor life.
That is clearly not the case, but it does create a possible inaccurate impression that the world media in general and the UK media in particular , have built on to the point where she is perceived as the scheming power behind the couple.
That may be true, but then again, it may not, and if the media is as accurate with its 'scheming harridan' as it is with its 'minor actress' nonsense, I think we should all be reaching for the salt and not judging reports of people we don't know, from people who don't know the couple.
You are assuming that the popular media perception is based on facts.
In at least one instance it is not - Ms Markle was not a 'little known actress' - she was a major character player in the US drama series Suits which ran from 2011 - 2019 - 134 episodes, and she was in 108 of them, giving her a high profile and and eight-figure bank balance.
The wording of the phrase 'succeeded in seducing a prince ... ' infers that she was successful where loads of other desperate women failed, and she was the desperate woman who succeeded, and it was the ticket out of her boring drab poor life.
That is clearly not the case, but it does create a possible inaccurate impression that the world media in general and the UK media in particular , have built on to the point where she is perceived as the scheming power behind the couple.
That may be true, but then again, it may not, and if the media is as accurate with its 'scheming harridan' as it is with its 'minor actress' nonsense, I think we should all be reaching for the salt and not judging reports of people we don't know, from people who don't know the couple.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.