I just have to have my occasional rant about this dreadful 'entertainment' that is still being shown after thirty (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) years.
Honestly, I know its cheap TV, but just how funny can a child hurting themselves - and the editing cutting the sound of crying, and the visuals before the face crumples into distress or contorts with agony - be, even for a dubbed audience that would have to be deranged to still find such nonsense funny after fifteen seconds, never mind an entire show's worth.
I find it repugnant that people are paid to send clips of their children hurting themselves for the 'entertainment' of viewing audiences, and it says something about those audiences that this pain-fest is still running and has been since 1990.
Honestly people, we are better than thinking that someone else's toddler being frightened or hurt, or both, is somehow funny - I think it should be taken off air today.
I've seen kids cry on it before. Like I said, all kids are different. One of my boys was heartbroken every time I said no. I'm not talking about saying no to having sweets or something. No...as in 'no, don't touch the fire'
ummm - // I've seen kids cry on it before. Like I said, all kids are different. One of my boys was heartbroken every time I said no. I'm not talking about saying no to having sweets or something. No...as in 'no, don't touch the fire'
It was cute, sad and funny in equal measures.
Kids don't cry just out of pain or fright. //
I don't care if they are crying because they can't have sweets - the notion of filming a child being upset and then showing it for entertainment is utterly repugnant, and I remain amazed at your desire to defend it by offering degrees of suffering that seem to make it OK in your eyes.