Trump/Ukraine, What Will He Do?
News0 min ago
Here Lies Meghan Markle
100 Answers
anyone watching ?
Meghan re-imagining her life - she has given up so much to marry Hazza - excuse me?
No army time for harry - either because the tommies wdnt turn up or because it is not about Megz
first two hours, were the acadian times - they had so much going for them, and the next four hours will be about them squandering it all
Meghan re-imagining her life - she has given up so much to marry Hazza - excuse me?
No army time for harry - either because the tommies wdnt turn up or because it is not about Megz
first two hours, were the acadian times - they had so much going for them, and the next four hours will be about them squandering it all
Answers
It's true what they say, there's no show without Punch!!
https:/
https:/
Three hours of paranoia, vitriol, self-adoration, and a generous dollop of boredom, I struggled to stay awake much of the time. They said some horrible things though. Meghan's jealousy of Kate was apparent, and I've never seen hatred towards Archie - but Harry claims it.
I looked at AH's link and got fed up clicking 'next', so I still don't know why, in Paul Burrell's opinion, Harry married Meghan.
I looked at AH's link and got fed up clicking 'next', so I still don't know why, in Paul Burrell's opinion, Harry married Meghan.
naomi; I'm amazed that you (or anyone) could sit through 3 hours of this tripe.
Piers Morgan did, but he's getting paid for it, & he sums it up in no uncertain terms in the video;
https:/
Piers Morgan did, but he's getting paid for it, & he sums it up in no uncertain terms in the video;
https:/
Glad I’m not watching it either
https:/
https:/
evadora - you are not missing much
the critics ( instead of PP ipse) said there was not much new, and a lot rehashed
certainly there has to be an Arcadian episode before you can pour out how much Hell one's gilded life in California is. Hazza's thesis (if he can have one) is that this is all to do with colour.
and yet, history repeats itself, and all this happened previously to his dear mother who was hounded to her early and untimely death....
who was a white girl so it cant be a matter of colour.
There are a few other howling or screaming non sequiturs, slavery in the British Empire whereas Mozza has no connection at all with one of the colonies, but does has to do with slavery in the confederacy
(yeah OK but the disgusting conditions of slavery in the British Empire compared to the South ( of the United States silly!) does account for the alleged racism in the Palace. sort of) 200 y later
the critics ( instead of PP ipse) said there was not much new, and a lot rehashed
certainly there has to be an Arcadian episode before you can pour out how much Hell one's gilded life in California is. Hazza's thesis (if he can have one) is that this is all to do with colour.
and yet, history repeats itself, and all this happened previously to his dear mother who was hounded to her early and untimely death....
who was a white girl so it cant be a matter of colour.
There are a few other howling or screaming non sequiturs, slavery in the British Empire whereas Mozza has no connection at all with one of the colonies, but does has to do with slavery in the confederacy
(yeah OK but the disgusting conditions of slavery in the British Empire compared to the South ( of the United States silly!) does account for the alleged racism in the Palace. sort of) 200 y later
Even Harry looks embarrassed that she mocked his grandmother
https:/
https:/
The Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson parallels are amazingly close.
well yeah like
1. they were both sons of kings
2. they both married American women who were divorced
3. they both married incredz scheming minxes
4.they both made a hash of the rest of their lives
5. both men were incredz popular before marriage
BUT
Hazza didnt cause a constitutional crisis (*)
Edward was paid off
Edward didnt squawk
Edward was given er paid work ( Gov of Bahamas) which he made a hash of .
Edward visited Germany and MAY have kept up ties with the Huns
whereas Hazza speaks not a word of Russian, ( or chinese)
well yeah like
1. they were both sons of kings
2. they both married American women who were divorced
3. they both married incredz scheming minxes
4.they both made a hash of the rest of their lives
5. both men were incredz popular before marriage
BUT
Hazza didnt cause a constitutional crisis (*)
Edward was paid off
Edward didnt squawk
Edward was given er paid work ( Gov of Bahamas) which he made a hash of .
Edward visited Germany and MAY have kept up ties with the Huns
whereas Hazza speaks not a word of Russian, ( or chinese)
(*) The govt decided that the King had to abdicate simutaneously and not for a moment cd the King be King in one place and Mr Windor ( ye Dook) in another
Mr de Valera of Ireland seized his chance and demanded no less than SIX enabling Acts ( from London) concerning Oireland before signing up to Abdication....
One of which was power to name the Governor General which de Valera did - a man in a council house who declared he was staying there and not moving to Phoenix Park.
Mr de Valera of Ireland seized his chance and demanded no less than SIX enabling Acts ( from London) concerning Oireland before signing up to Abdication....
One of which was power to name the Governor General which de Valera did - a man in a council house who declared he was staying there and not moving to Phoenix Park.
naomi - // but they pontificate nevertheless - albeit in ignorance. ;o) //
If everyone who offered a view on anything on this site was required to be ab 'expert' before posting, the site would have died twenty years ago.
It's not necessary to know everything about anything in order to hold, and express, an opinion on it.
I am always delighted to bow to the superior knowledge of anyone who knows more about something than I do - assuming of course that they don't declaim that knowldge in a pompous schoolmarm'ish manner, which tends to lead me to conclude that they are actually only pretending to know something more than I, when they have no evidence whatsoever.
For example - i would never gainsay anything Buenchico said about computers, his record speaks for itself.
Nor would I take issue with Sqad on medical matters, since he is an ex-doctor.
Of course, on the more nebulous and less clearly defined areas like . ooooh .... let me see ... Islam for example, I am happy to bow to any proven expert on here, but have yet to encounter one.
If everyone who offered a view on anything on this site was required to be ab 'expert' before posting, the site would have died twenty years ago.
It's not necessary to know everything about anything in order to hold, and express, an opinion on it.
I am always delighted to bow to the superior knowledge of anyone who knows more about something than I do - assuming of course that they don't declaim that knowldge in a pompous schoolmarm'ish manner, which tends to lead me to conclude that they are actually only pretending to know something more than I, when they have no evidence whatsoever.
For example - i would never gainsay anything Buenchico said about computers, his record speaks for itself.
Nor would I take issue with Sqad on medical matters, since he is an ex-doctor.
Of course, on the more nebulous and less clearly defined areas like . ooooh .... let me see ... Islam for example, I am happy to bow to any proven expert on here, but have yet to encounter one.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.