Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
University Challenge
30 Answers
I love this programme as I avidly watch and hope to be able to answer maybe two or three decent answers. On tonight's show one of the teams was Robert Gordon. One of the contestants was a black student studying to achieve a Doctorate. Clearly no fool.
However, no matter how often the director panned the camera to the left it never showed the individual speaking about anything being asked by Jeremy. There was more contribution to this programme from my armchair than them. How on earth was this person chosen to represent their University? Anyone else notice.
However, no matter how often the director panned the camera to the left it never showed the individual speaking about anything being asked by Jeremy. There was more contribution to this programme from my armchair than them. How on earth was this person chosen to represent their University? Anyone else notice.
Answers
Exactly - he's never said a word in all their appearances. Nothing to do with his colour, just a useless member of the team who should never have been chosen to represent their uni.
21:41 Mon 03rd Apr 2023
SELECTION is up to the college/ uni. Hull 1970 was the president of the union and three cronies ( didnt do well)
Others have an internal knock out. conducted by the students. But if all the top scorers score 40 on English and History, will that give a balanced team ?( no)
In my own selection 1972, the results were Pollard first and I was second, and there was hollering like you get on AB when I post a little ditty. Howling like you never heard. Blood curdling screams. So we did the whole thing again, and Pollard was first and I was second.
( shows minimal inter-examination variability - = good). We did nt do that well ( shows shows the question paper didnt test what was wanted, reqd)
Others have an internal knock out. conducted by the students. But if all the top scorers score 40 on English and History, will that give a balanced team ?( no)
In my own selection 1972, the results were Pollard first and I was second, and there was hollering like you get on AB when I post a little ditty. Howling like you never heard. Blood curdling screams. So we did the whole thing again, and Pollard was first and I was second.
( shows minimal inter-examination variability - = good). We did nt do that well ( shows shows the question paper didnt test what was wanted, reqd)