ChatterBank2 mins ago
Capturing the Friedmans
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by natalie_1982. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I kept changing my mind too and then I felt guilty for getting it wrong!
Right up to the last half hour, I thought they were innocent! Then that lawyer told us what Mr Freidman had said in the prison. I think that Arnold Freidman was a paedophile, but I'm not convinced that he abused the boys he got sent away for. I still don't know about Jesse. I think he is a troubled man who displays signs of being abused, but couldn't say whether or not he is a paedophile.
The one I didn't like was the brother David! the Clown, not comfortable with him at all. I think there was a bit of a strange trait running through that family to be honest. I thought the Mother was the most normal, and that's saying something!
He was Jesse's lawyer and went to see Mr Freidman after he'd been incarcerated. Jesse was in the waiting room and the lawyer was sitting at a visitors table opposite Mr Freidman. There was a visitor for another prisoner at the next table with a young boy.
Mr Freidman asked the lawyer to ask the guard if they could switch tables, when the lawyer asked why, Mr Friedman said, because that young boy bouncing on that mans knee is getting me very excited. The lawyer said he'd never been so shocked in his life. Mr Freidman went on to say that he had had 'relations' with two boys at a holiday resort they stayed at every year. But that he had not abused anyone in the computer classes.
The lawyer also said that Jesse broke down in his office and admitted that his father had abused him. Although Jesse denys this and says that the lawyer was adamant that Jesse had been abused and nothing he (Jesse) could say would make him think otherwise. Jesse also wanted to make a plea as the sentance was significantly less and he thought that there was no way he would get a fair trial. The lawyer said he could not let Jesse purger himself and he couldn't say he was guilty if he wasn't. Jesse then said that he was guilty and would say so in court. The lawyer never believed that Jesse was guilty.
This might in some way explain how calm he was before the trial, he knew what he had to do, and had decided to get on with it.
There was also a major 'witness' who had only 'remembered' things after he'd be hypnotised. I didn't believe a word he said. And parents of children that were in the computer class who said that nothing had happened to their children but that the local police and some of the other families had put a lot of pressure on them to say that they had.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.