Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
it's BLATANTLY not PATENTLY grrrr
31 Answers
Why does ITV insist upon butchering our language? First it was Jeremy Kyle on about someone being "patently ignorant" then on Emmerdale tonight it was apparently "patently obvious" - it's "blatantly"!! What is wrong with these people?!?!?!!?!?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by blink_babe13. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i know what you mean! It drives me mad too!
The one that really gets me is when someone says they are being "pressurised" instead of being put under pressure. Even newsreaders have said it "So and so is being pressurized into resigning" etc
Aaaggghhh!!!!
Maybe the offending people should be truly pressurized so that they know the difference!
The one that really gets me is when someone says they are being "pressurised" instead of being put under pressure. Even newsreaders have said it "So and so is being pressurized into resigning" etc
Aaaggghhh!!!!
Maybe the offending people should be truly pressurized so that they know the difference!
Snap, lady_p_gold! Pressurised into resigning is also correct - pressurize or pressurise vt to adjust the pressure within (an enclosed compartment such as an aircraft cabin) so that nearly normal atmospheric pressure is constantly maintained; to subject to pressure; to force by pressure (into doing something), to coerce.
-- answer removed --
goldenfield - your reasoning is not sound...
Blatant has the original meaning:
Of persons or their words: Noisy; offensively or vulgarly clamorous; bellowing
but in more recent usage:
obtrusive to the eye (rather than to the ear as in orig. senses); glaringly or defiantly conspicuous; palpably prominent or obvious
therefore "blatantly obvious" is as much a tautologism as "patently obvious" but both are being used to emphasise a point, which I would have thought is "plainly obvious" ;-)
Blatant has the original meaning:
Of persons or their words: Noisy; offensively or vulgarly clamorous; bellowing
but in more recent usage:
obtrusive to the eye (rather than to the ear as in orig. senses); glaringly or defiantly conspicuous; palpably prominent or obvious
therefore "blatantly obvious" is as much a tautologism as "patently obvious" but both are being used to emphasise a point, which I would have thought is "plainly obvious" ;-)
kempie - what are you talking about? I said NOTHING about blatant in any of my posts! I most certainly did not say that blatantly obvious was any better than patently obvious! Tautologies do nothing, in my opinion, for the English language - if you say patently obvious just to emphasise a point then you do not have command over your own language as far as I am concerned. There is certainly no reason why you would have to ever use patently obvious when obvious is strong enough to cover any given situation.
My reasoning is perfectly sound, thank you very much, and I think it would be sensible for you to actually read my posts before suggesting that they are not!
My reasoning is perfectly sound, thank you very much, and I think it would be sensible for you to actually read my posts before suggesting that they are not!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.