dot, how does it turn the point of the scene around? I don't see what you're getting at. Rochester wants to see everyone's reactions and he still achieves this even though he's hiding rather than acting as the fortune teller.
The adaptation has, to my mind, so far been excellent. It's very atmospheric and conjures the slightly other-worldly environment of the house very well, yet it also has a subtle up-to-date feel too. This would have made that fortune-telling scene very jarring had they stuck with Rochester dressing up. In the spirit of this adaptation the way they handled that scene was spot-on. Crisgal, bear in mind one is a book, the other is a TV drama. The TV version has to stand up on its own and it can't just simply be the book transferred scene by scene intact. This scene indicates how a good adaptation should work.
I'm in love with Ruth Wilson, who plays Jane. Such assurance for someone just out of drama school. And she's so unconventionally beautiful, just as (in my mind) Jane should be. Those amazing eyebrows! And that slightly protruding top lip is SO cute! But I am watching it because it's good, not just to ogle her, honest.