ChatterBank0 min ago
Is it OK for Hollywood to bend real world history?
Is it OK for Hollywood to bend the truth as much as they do? Even though theres a lot of patronising pro-american movies, are they there simply for our own entertainment?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by dave_c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As more and more films 'based on fact' are produced, sadly the more and more misled some people will become about the truth. So no, it's not OK.
In my opinion Hollywood has a moral duty, if a film is based on truth, to base it on the absolute truth or make it utterly clear that certain parts of the film are made up. And I don't mean put a little disclaimer at the end that no-one reads or that is too small for it to be seen even at an iMax.
U-571.... need I say more.
Well, quite. A delightful gentleman of my acquaintance served on HMS Petard (which did capture the Enigma machine) so we of course got him U571 to watch. We thought the air would go blue, but he said he just fell asleep while watching it...
The sad thing is that Hollywood thinks Americans are interested only in things American. Perhaps this is true - a very small proportion of them have passports, after all. It's not so much that they bend the truth, more that they leave vast chunks of the truth out. In Saving Private Ryan you may have noticed that, apart from one tiny refugee French family, there were only Americans (and a few Germans) in France in WWII. So no, it's not OK, but unless Americans start taking a broader view and demanding change, Hollywood is not likely to listen to us whiny foreigners!
I suppose it all depends on wht you mean by OK and truth.
After 'Gandhi' was filmed, my brother commented to my mother that he didnt know that our grandfather had treated Indians like that. She gently explained in her opinion he hadnt. But there again, after Laurence of Arabia, in the last scenes where Claude Rains plays Dry-Dune, The Political Agent, she commented that grandfather was one of them - any army officer of whatever rank had to do what political agents 'suggested'. My brother grunted at that one.
In the Name of the Father was marred by Emma Thompson who was playing somene who really exists, gareth pierce bawling out the court of appeal. Unfortunately solicitors could not address judges of appeal in court (they can now)
In Schindlers' List, Liam Neelson's Schindler doesnt address the assembled workers in a good-bye speech at the end scene.....
But these are all dramas, and the dramatic action isnt wrecked by these little slips are they?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.