Why was Tracey allowed to win this week when it was obvious that her game plan was to give low marks to the others and to complain about everything. Her food, comprising mainly cupcakes, was rubbish and giving scores of 2, 4, 4 and 5 ensured she would win. The producers need to stop this type of game plan as it spoils the show.
i hated her. miserable whinging c@w.
Why did she talk like that? There's no way she should have won.
What about that pudding the vain guy did?!! He really thought it was going to win.
I love Come Dine With Me!
I do get cross when people vote all the other contestants low and then win. It will make people switch off if it keeps happening. Normally they make them up their scores, but in this case they didn't, perhaps they thought they were all about the same anyway.
Thanks all. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks the scoring should be monitored and adjusted where necessary. I remember that one where the girl said she was deliberately scoring low to win the competion and they made her increase her scores. The only difference here is Tracey (what a way to spell it) didn't admit it. It was obvious,though, when she gave the bodybuilder 2 points because he was a professional chef. He worked in a chip shop, some chef!
VHG - that big-headed tvvat was on come dine with me a couple of years ago. A hairdresser with an ego as big as the moon.
He was showing off his porsche chopping knife.
I had hoped watching him make a d1ck of himself on it, would have made him change his ways.
obviously he is just desperate to be on telly.
moron.
Happens all the time, they're chosen to include variations of a snob, a yob and a cheat. Simple solution, discard the lowest mark and replace it with the mean of the others.