I watched the WL (on Thursday or Friday - can't remember which one, now!) and the contestant's target of �1000 in the bank was reached in the first round, with no banks and with no incorrect answers.
However, in the pre-voting-off summary, the guy said "so-and-so was the strongest link and whats-his-name is the weakest link................" which puzzles me.
Everyone answered their only question correctly and nobody banked too early/late, so how could they determine who was "strongest" and "weakest" links?
if all questions are answered and nobody banks it automatically stops when it gets to �1000 as then everyone has a had a question asked and then it goes to weakest and strongest link by speed of questions answered
It has nothing to do with speed of answering.
Provided no one gets a question wrong then the person who started first banks the �1000 and is therefore then the strongest link. The next person along is then the weakest link as the amount of money their question was worth was the lowest . Subsequent contestants then become 2nd.3rd,4th weakest etc.