Other Sports3 mins ago
Range Rover Evoque Immobilized Following Software Upgrade
I left my car into the garage because I was receiving incorrect Theft Alert notifications.
They didn't know what was causing it and did a software update. But unfortunately that caused the car to become totally immobilized. I was told that they would need to put in a new telematics control unit to fix it.
I wasn't happy because before I left it in the car was running perfectly well, then while it was in their care it became immobilized necessitating me having to pay for a very expensive part to be able to even drive it away from them.
When I said that I wasn't happy they said that it happens on rare occasions so I thought I had been unfortunate - until he then said that it happens in approx 1 in every 10 cases - which I wouldn't consider rare at all! If that is the case should they not have notified me about the fairly high risk of complete immobilization? If I was leaving my dog into the vet for a scan and they said that there was a 1 in 10 chance of its leg falling off as a result, I would want to know about those risks so that I could weigh up my options!
I think I could have lived with receiving the odd mistaken anti-theft text rather than being without my car for 3 days and having to foot a very substantial bill just to be able to drive it home again.
Does anyone have experience of this kind of issue? Do the garages actions seem reasonable? Is this a common issue with Evoques? I there anything I should do to challenge them?
Thanks.
They didn't know what was causing it and did a software update. But unfortunately that caused the car to become totally immobilized. I was told that they would need to put in a new telematics control unit to fix it.
I wasn't happy because before I left it in the car was running perfectly well, then while it was in their care it became immobilized necessitating me having to pay for a very expensive part to be able to even drive it away from them.
When I said that I wasn't happy they said that it happens on rare occasions so I thought I had been unfortunate - until he then said that it happens in approx 1 in every 10 cases - which I wouldn't consider rare at all! If that is the case should they not have notified me about the fairly high risk of complete immobilization? If I was leaving my dog into the vet for a scan and they said that there was a 1 in 10 chance of its leg falling off as a result, I would want to know about those risks so that I could weigh up my options!
I think I could have lived with receiving the odd mistaken anti-theft text rather than being without my car for 3 days and having to foot a very substantial bill just to be able to drive it home again.
Does anyone have experience of this kind of issue? Do the garages actions seem reasonable? Is this a common issue with Evoques? I there anything I should do to challenge them?
Thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by shivvy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What have they asked you to pay?
If it's the full price, I would start by pointing out how unreasonable that was, and asking if JLR can support them in fixing your car.
Then take it to JLR yourself if the dealer is not proving helpful. Some contact details here:
https:/ /www.co mplaint sdepart ment.co .uk/lan d-rover -uk/
If it's the full price, I would start by pointing out how unreasonable that was, and asking if JLR can support them in fixing your car.
Then take it to JLR yourself if the dealer is not proving helpful. Some contact details here:
https:/
Yep, as Tora says.
Ask to speak to the service manager and explain how unreasonable and unjustifiable you think it is to place all the charges on you in the circumstances. Ask them what they can do to help, and/or whether they will contact JLR to see if they will support too.
In the past I've had a big aircon problem on an out of warranty JLR vehicle and got 75% of the cost paid by JLR themselves, with the dealer's service manager negotiating on my behalf with JLR. It's unreasonable to charge you full price parts and labour when the problem lies with them, not you. You need the service manager to be on your side, or failing that you need to go direct to JLR and complain about the service manager.
Ask to speak to the service manager and explain how unreasonable and unjustifiable you think it is to place all the charges on you in the circumstances. Ask them what they can do to help, and/or whether they will contact JLR to see if they will support too.
In the past I've had a big aircon problem on an out of warranty JLR vehicle and got 75% of the cost paid by JLR themselves, with the dealer's service manager negotiating on my behalf with JLR. It's unreasonable to charge you full price parts and labour when the problem lies with them, not you. You need the service manager to be on your side, or failing that you need to go direct to JLR and complain about the service manager.
Just off the phone to the manager. After a long chat he has said that he will talk to LR about assisting with the payment.
He said that they couldn't revert the software update because the circuit board was burnt out?
I think what annoys me most is that I was given no options or idea of the risk of an update until the car was totally immobilised and I had to pay over 800 quid to be able to drive it back out of the *** place.
He said that they couldn't revert the software update because the circuit board was burnt out?
I think what annoys me most is that I was given no options or idea of the risk of an update until the car was totally immobilised and I had to pay over 800 quid to be able to drive it back out of the *** place.
The key point here is that you took the car in because of spurious notifications. They did not know what was wrong but went ahead with a procedure anyway not knowing the effects. Imagine if surgeons did that! Anyway they *** the CU and then expected you to pay for a new one. Personally I think now they have actually fixed it I'd say I want 50% off the bill or I'll pay the whole thing and seek to recover what I can via small claims. They'll then offer some sort of discount but no doubt bar you as a "trouble maker". Remember in the motor trade the bigger the facade the bigger the thieves. They basically had no clue in the first place and used your money to experiment with.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.