Crosswords0 min ago
mot tests
14 Answers
i am buying a car on 1 aug at which date it will be three years old. i have been informed that it had a mot five weeks ago.
can anyone tell me the rules re how far in advance is a test permissable.
there must be one but my wife says the garage says it will be acceptable, i think not.
in anticipation, thanks
can anyone tell me the rules re how far in advance is a test permissable.
there must be one but my wife says the garage says it will be acceptable, i think not.
in anticipation, thanks
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by informashun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My dad is a mechanic and I think what he's said before is that you can have it done 1 month less 1 day before it's due to run out! So if its due to run out on the 1st June, you can have it done from the 2nd May onwards next year.
But i may not be 100% correct in this so don't take my word for it! Call up your local MOT garage or google it!!
But i may not be 100% correct in this so don't take my word for it! Call up your local MOT garage or google it!!
you can do it whenever you like, the one month less 1 day bit refers to how far forward they can date an MOT. So if your mot is due on 1 june you can have it done on 2 may but provided you supply the old mot they can date the new one from 2nd june not 3rd May. If that is not an issue then you can have it done whenever you like. It's common practise to do an early mot on cars that are comming up to 3 years old for selling purposes.
Surely the only issue here is `was the car given an MOT five weeks ago`. If it was then you can see for yourself by looking at the document. Hammer is the only person talking sense!. You should have no interest in the other "replies" as they just DO NOT apply. Until 1st. August, the car does not need an MOT so why confuse the issue in typlical loosehead fashion.
Surely the only issue here is `was the car given an MOT five weeks ago`?. If it was then you can see for yourself by looking at the document. If it wasn`t, then you either need sight of an MOT before 1st. August or quickly get out of the deal. Hammer is the only person talking sense!. You should have no interest in the other "replies" as they just DO NOT apply. Until 1st. August, the car does not need an MOT so why confuse the issue in typical loosehead fashion.
-- answer removed --
Whos's confusing the issue? I was giveing the accurate answer and at the same time explaining some of the others. What's your problem cliffspratty? and why did you have to say it twice. Try reading what I wrote instead of jumping in without digesting it.
Does not my first sentence agree with Hammer? All I've done is offer further info, if that is "typical loosehead fashion� then I can think of worse things.
What a pratt you are, cliffsarse, read all my 3k + posts have we? Go on an then come back and tell me what is "typical Loosehead fashion"
Does not my first sentence agree with Hammer? All I've done is offer further info, if that is "typical loosehead fashion� then I can think of worse things.
What a pratt you are, cliffsarse, read all my 3k + posts have we? Go on an then come back and tell me what is "typical Loosehead fashion"
Cliffs, where do you consider my answer not to apply.
Had the mot done 5 weeks ago said that tyres or brakes are worn to point of needing replacing soon and that vehicle has been used since then the tyres or brakes may not be safe but now.
I suggested the request of an mot when the date of purchase comes around for peace of mind.
Had the mot done 5 weeks ago said that tyres or brakes are worn to point of needing replacing soon and that vehicle has been used since then the tyres or brakes may not be safe but now.
I suggested the request of an mot when the date of purchase comes around for peace of mind.