Donate SIGN UP

Which is better?

Avatar Image
missnemesis | 10:28 Mon 06th Apr 2009 | Motoring
5 Answers
Good morning all. My OH is looking to buy a new towbar, ball etc for our car. Up until now we have used a ' flange ' style ball however he is now considering buying a ' swan neck ' Before we commit to buy one or the other I would be interested to learn your views and opinions on the pros / cons of each.

Also which is better to use with a stabiliser bar?

Thanks in Advance
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by missnemesis. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If you are using a stabiliser which requires an anchorage at the ball (Scott or similar) fixing this anchor to a swanneck can be a problem. However the more recent type of stabiliser which clamps onto the ball with friction pads is fine with a swanneck and I think looks neater.
Question Author
Thanks for your reply malana-3.
Hi I have had many cars with different tow bars, for a change I had a swan neck fitted on my last car, personally a blooming nightmare. The electrics are slung under the bumper and every speed hump or pot hole whilst towing would pull the electrics out, on the new car I have a flange type, again personally alot better because of the variety in extras you can get like a bumper protector, a tow bar mounted bike carrier (ideal if you have a caravan) plust IF anything happens to the ball they are ALOT cheaper to replace. Good luck anyway. (P.S.) this is just a personal preference)
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Which is better?

Answer Question >>