ChatterBank0 min ago
Provisional Driving Licence
32 Answers
My daughter had her licence took off her for three years.which has now gone,DVLA sent her a letter telling her she must pay £65 to get it back,which she did...it came today and it is a provisional one,meaning she has to take her test all over again.THere was no mention of this in the letter or the person she spoke to at DVLA.
Is this correct.
Is this correct.
Answers
No it is not relevant here, Chris. The "New Drivers" regulations stipulate that anyone who acquires six or more points for offences committed within two years of passing a driving test for the first time will have their full licence revoked and they will revert to provisional status. Oddly, this penalty does not apply to drivers who are disqualified (unless...
11:58 Tue 22nd Jul 2014
I know one does not know the driving test instructor and one can book a test individually,it says so on the website for the ones near to where we live.
I know someone who did.
Insurance,yes,I know...she will not be getting her own,she can`t afford a car ,she was on my husband`s insurance as a second driver(I don`t drive) ,and we know,it will be a lot more that what it was before her ban.Have spoken to them and they are ok with insuring her...
I know someone who did.
Insurance,yes,I know...she will not be getting her own,she can`t afford a car ,she was on my husband`s insurance as a second driver(I don`t drive) ,and we know,it will be a lot more that what it was before her ban.Have spoken to them and they are ok with insuring her...
I think to avoid any confusion, kloofneck, you should refer to the person who passes or fails someone taking a driving test as an "examiner". He or she does not instruct. That's why I was confused earlier. When you mentioned a "driving test instructor" I thought you meant somebody who would give driving lessons but would also go with the learner to the test centre.
She (and your husband) also needs to be aware of the insurance practice known as "fronting". You have not given the details but if your husband is the registered keeper of a car of which your daughter is the main user the insurers may consider that they have been deceived in order to reduce the premium. This is known as "fronting". It can lead to the insurers retrospectively cancelling the policy and both your daughter and your husband may be liable for prosecution for having no insurance.
She (and your husband) also needs to be aware of the insurance practice known as "fronting". You have not given the details but if your husband is the registered keeper of a car of which your daughter is the main user the insurers may consider that they have been deceived in order to reduce the premium. This is known as "fronting". It can lead to the insurers retrospectively cancelling the policy and both your daughter and your husband may be liable for prosecution for having no insurance.
^^ you are still going to have the insurance problem kloofnek.
With your daughters record very few if any insurers will even allow her as a named driver, those that do will charge several £1,000s in extra premiums.
You may want to call your insurer and just enquire if your daughter will be allowed on your insurance and if so at what cost. Be prepared for a nasty shock though !!.
With your daughters record very few if any insurers will even allow her as a named driver, those that do will charge several £1,000s in extra premiums.
You may want to call your insurer and just enquire if your daughter will be allowed on your insurance and if so at what cost. Be prepared for a nasty shock though !!.