Donate SIGN UP

no insurence

Avatar Image
sigma | 11:20 Tue 14th Aug 2007 | Road rules
6 Answers
Am I right in thinking if you're super rich or a large organisation like the GPO and can financially meet any claim against you, you don't need insurence.?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sigma. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well Norman's the expert but I think I read somewhere that if the organisation can deposit funds, running into millions, I believe, then they can effectively "self insure", I'm told that the Police do this to cover all thier vehicles but the info is a bit vague, may well be an Urban myth.
There did used to be some way that you could drive without insurance - I can not remember the details - but you had to deposit �15,000 that was only to be used if there was a claim against you . I think that this is no longer the case as �15000 is not a lot in insurance terms - but only hangs on as an urban myth.
The Road Traffic Act 1988 (as amended) defines the requirements (and exceptions) for users of motor vehicles to be insured or secured against third-party risks.

Section 144 lists the exceptions, including

� a person who has deposited and keeps deposited with the Accountant General of the Supreme Court the sum of �500,000;

� a vehicle owned by a police authority;

� a vehicle owned by a health service body;

� a vehicle owned by the council of a county or county district in England and Wales, the Broads Authority, the Common Council of the City of London, the council of a London borough, a National Park authority, the Inner London Education Authority, the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority;

etc.

at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner�s control.
kempie,is perfectly right,one of my drivers had a run in with a TNT lorry recently,and they were bonded insured,ie british telecom,post office etc,it would not be of any use to a multi millionaire as the money,would not earn any intrest.but i expect NEW JUDGE will be on later to ridicule our answers like he always does.
Section 144 does not include the Armed services, they do not have taxed or insured vehicles.

Incidently, Prince Harry does not have insurance for his motorbike, last I heard it was a Triumph triple, because no company would insure him, perhaps Mummy pays the �500,000.
toureman,mummy passed away 10 yrs ago.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

no insurence

Answer Question >>