ChatterBank1 min ago
Cover Version Amnesty
OK, I know that songwriters are glad of other people covering their songs so that they get their rotalties......but has there ever been a call for the pop charts to go 'All Original'? The latest boy and girl bands all cover old songs with no original slant, so aren't we simply discouraging new songwriters to bother?
Any other AB-ers agree that we should lobby for a one year amnesty on cover versions being allowed entry into the charts? Or would the boy/girl band manipulators veto this due to an obvious reduction in their own take?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Birchy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well the album chart split a good few years back to stop the "Now, that's what I call milking a cash cow till it's dry" series constantly flooding the chart.....perhaps we'll see the same at some point from the singles chart BUT I really don't think so because since day one the charts ahve been full of cover versions...in fact it was much worse back in the fifties and sixties...for example Unchained Melody was in the chart by Four acts at the same time in '55 (anyone know then with looking at the guinness?)....what goes around comes around! I think we are going back towards guitar bands at the minute...here's hoping anyways.
Jenstar....NO ! Honest. My daughters are seven and five, and they listen to and watch all the latest pop chart stuff. I like a lot of it. My argument really is that cover versions done the same as the original (Rick Astley "When I Fall In Love", Mick Hucknall "If You Don't Know Me By Now" etc.) have no point. Flying Lizards' quirky stuff and Ted Chippington's "She Loves You" are marvellous. They take songs and do something with them.....as opposed to loads of people who do not. My argument - actually - is "What's the point in taking (say) Mandy and doing it just like Barry Manilow did?".
Not sure how to police this, other than paying me to listen to every single released and letting me decide. Which is back to Jenstar's point about one's own personal taste being fab and beyond reproach.
There would also be the danger that I would ban original songs by Phil Collins, Chris de Burgh, Dire Straits, Texas, Travis, The Stereophonics (nee Deacon Blue) and Sting, simply because their songs go staright to my bile duct.
I would also ban Paul McCartney from standing up and playing a guitar because he looks like someone's grandad at a family get-together when he does it.
Also I'd have to ban "cute" records by children and "Fun" stuff by the likes of Shane Ritchie because they induce comments like "ooh, but they're harmless.....don't be such a grump". Then you find yourself hitting the person who said that with a spade. You know what I mean?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.