ChatterBank1 min ago
Whats the point with surviving rock stars?
Whats the point with surviving rock stars?
Lets face it only the good die young. Would the Stones, Dylan and Clapton be even bigger if the would have had the decency to OD or commit suicide like their colleges.
Think we wouldn't have had to hear Jagger and Bowies Dancing in the streets! It is one thing with Stones and Dylan or a better example AC/DC the don't change that much. Bowies albums the last 25 years are awful and Robert Plant are even worse.
And what about the embarrisicing reunions, don't they have enuff money in the bank.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Yeah Bee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Wheter the dead legends would have made more exelent music if they had survived is a totally different question, although interesting. A guy like Lennon did his best work a short time before he died. And you said that I should only listen to the early stuff and yeah I do but for the example with Bowie thats like Da vinci on and Etch-A-Scheatch. You also said people can't stay young and handsome but isn't that what they try to do. Mick Jagger strutting on like a 18 year old. Then i will give Clapton and Jimmy Page some respect they have grown older both in mind and body. They don't try to be hipp and cool all the time cuz that is patetich. And with the reunions that is false advertisment. You know i have seen the Wailers and one of them did play on Bobs time. Or Motley Crue is coming out on a reunion tour, as load as ever and fater then ever.
For closure i would like to quate and very wiz man Homer J Simpson
"Why must there be new bands can't the old ones just keep on makin albums"
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.