News1 min ago
I not trying to be controversial.but does what Jon Venables has done really concern Mrs Fergus?
51 Answers
I know he killed her son in disgusting circumstances,and he got off lightly,but is this new crime any of her business? Apparently she has demanded to meet Jack Straw so he can tell her what he's done,and he's agreed.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Revel. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Back to the topic if it had been my child that had been killed in such a way I would certainly want to know for the rest of my life that it was just to make such efforts to 'rehabilitate' the killers into society. Some might argue (and I may agree) that anybody who could have done that at their age must be so twisted they don't deserve a life.
-- answer removed --
one rule for one and another for another!!! why is it her business about what he has done now, they dealt with the crime he commited on her child, and now she should just butt out and let the law deal with him on what he has done now, Jack Straw needs to get a grip and deal with things and tell her if he wants to, not be bullied into meeting her, just coz she had gone through that, alot of kids have been killed since then, are all the parents gonna want to personnely tag the ones that commited the crime on their kids. But i think they should hang him and anyone else that hurts kids!!!
-- answer removed --
Far too many children have been murdered, and most by adults who should have been a lot more aware of what they were doing and how wrong it was. I am in no way defending Jamie Bulger's killers and I know the details of the crime were particularly shocking, but I'm sure he was not the first or last child to be tortured or to die in terror. The media tends to concentrate on crimes such as these because the perpatrators are unexpected. No one thinks a child could do this, or a woman - so murderers such as Thomson and Venables, and Hindley are seen as so much worse than other killers. Should every relative of a murder victim be given the right to know every move of their loved one's killer? or is it only high profile cases where Sun readers want to lynch those concerned that gives this right to victims' families? The boys have carried out their sentence regardless of whether we think it was long enough, they should now be left alone and any future crimes they may commit should be dealt with as individual cases - the same as what happens with all other criminals.
for goodness sake, a very serious crime, one child dead, two others in fear for their lives and families destroyed and you lot can complain about is text speak, someones age and how many characters ive used, i thought this was a forum for intelligent people to comment on subjects that they are interested in, not pathetic moaning gripes
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.