Donate SIGN UP

Syrian Arab Republic

Avatar Image
Khandro | 11:34 Thu 13th Dec 2012 | Politics
4 Answers
President Asad claims that he is defending a legal, presidential, secular regime against its overthrow by terrorists wishing for its replacement by a non-secular government represented by the Muslim brotherhood.
Does he have a point?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The trouble with Assad is, he lost whatever sympathy he might (and probably would) have got from the civilised world when he started employing his late dad's tactics in attempting to suppress dissent by, effectively, genocide.
His days are numbered, but what lies in store as an alternative for Syria is uncertain. As long as the people who preach (even peaceful) non-intervention even don't start moaning if the outcome does not turn out to be any better.
Question Author
Looking at Egypt, I'm reminded that someone once said " When tearing down the statues of tyrants, keep the plinths - they always come in handy".
he might well do; Syria was always fairly secular, like Turkey. Unforunately when secular leaders turn out to be murderous tyrants, people get to thinking they'd be no worse in an Islamic theocracy.
-- answer removed --

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Syrian Arab Republic

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.