Donald Trump Compared To Sunac/Starmer

[Khandro]

Well, there really isn't any comparison with our lack lustre policy-less leaders of both major parties is there ?

 'Whereas Trump’s second-term plans are no mystery. They’re all laid out in a series of ‘Agenda 47’ videos he put out last year. He will ‘build on his historic success’ of reducing America’s dependence on China through ‘universal baseline tariffs’. ‘The heart of my vision is a sweeping pro–American overhaul of our tax and trade policy to move from the Biden system that punishes domestic producers and rewards outsources to a system that rewards domestic production and taxes foreign companies and those who export American jobs.’

He has proposals to restore law and order, execute drug dealers, [Wow!] ‘give power back to American parents’, ‘protect children from left-wing gender insanity’ and ‘students from the radical left and Marxist maniacs’.

 He warns that ‘World War III has never been closer than it is right now’ and pledges to smash ‘the corrupt globalist establishment that has botched every foreign policy decision for decades, and that includes President Biden’. He promises ‘peace through strength’. Easier said than done, but it’s a potent message when voters look at worsening situations in Ukraine, Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Trump’s twin policy obsessions are immigration and energy security. He has said that he will not be a dictator ‘other than day one. We’re closing the border and we’re drilling, drilling, drilling.’ He vows to undo Biden’s Green New Deal (‘I call it Green New Hoax’) and revive US industry by ‘ensuring that America has the lowest cost of energy of any industrial country anywhere on earth… We will develop the liquid gold that is right under our feet… and more energy will mean lower inflation and it’ll mean more jobs.’

If you were a U.S. citizen, why would you not yote for him?? 

[Untitled]

"

The first that springs to mind is  Lee Kuan Yew, Prime Minister of Singapore from 1959 - 1990. 

Then Tito of Yugoslavia - there must be others -- Charles 1 was a kind monarch, I think. "

an autocrat cannot exist without oppression and exploitation. charles I may have been kind (i don't know) but he led a brutal and exploitative system of government that showered riches upon him and left many of his subjects destitute.
interesting indeed that you admire tito... i shall remember that the next time some idiot calls me a communist. 

[dave50]

It will be hilarious if trump wins, worth it just to see the Liberals jumping up and down in downright fury  foaming at the mouth.

[Peter Pedant]

god I keep on thinking that this  is

Donald Trump compared to Sunak's sister !

I dont think he wants to compare her, but something else ! hur hur hur - he is after all, he says, very rich

[Peter Pedant]

It will be hilarious if trump wins, - - - yeah foo, I bet the Ukrainians and Gazans are laughing already

[Untitled]

and davebro neatly encapsulates the only reason anyone actually supports this lunatic

it's not policy

it's not patriotism

it's not morals 

it's not national interest

it's not in fact ideas, principles or coherent reasons of any sort

it's about upsetting liberals. "owning the libs". that's about as deep as the trump movement goes. they are nothing.

[New Judge]

"....that's about as deep as the trump movement goes. they are nothing."

Depends on your definition of "nothing". He was installed as President eight years ago and there seems a very good chance he will succeed again. If you mean they have nothing to offer, probably 50% of Americans (or thereabouts) would disagree.