Business & Finance3 mins ago
Gay ... But Not Really
32 Answers
The Church now says that it will be okay to be a gay Bishop ...
... as long as you don't actually "do gay stuff".
So they are only allowed to be "gay" in their heads.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13831162
If you can be gay without actually doing gay things, then I am teetotal, and a vegetarian.
Is this another instance of the Church leaders having no grasp of reality?
... as long as you don't actually "do gay stuff".
So they are only allowed to be "gay" in their heads.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13831162
If you can be gay without actually doing gay things, then I am teetotal, and a vegetarian.
Is this another instance of the Church leaders having no grasp of reality?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joggerjayne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
JJ
Glad you brought this one up, because I honestly think that the CofE is doing its utmost to modernise, without alienating it's conservative wing, and this is literally the best they could come up with.
The Bible condemns homosexuality, and I believe it states that gays should be stoned (and not in the 'Pete Doherty/Amy Winehouse way').
This obviously doesn't fit in with who we are in the 21st century, but a neat 'get out clause' is for the church to say - "Okay, you're gay - you can be a bishop...but just don't do the sex stuff".
In that way, they're actually complying with the written word of the Lord, in that, the Bible doesn't say that you cannot be a man and fancy David Beckham, Tom Hardy or Jason Statham. It just says that if you do, and you sleep with them, then you're an abomination.
Glad you brought this one up, because I honestly think that the CofE is doing its utmost to modernise, without alienating it's conservative wing, and this is literally the best they could come up with.
The Bible condemns homosexuality, and I believe it states that gays should be stoned (and not in the 'Pete Doherty/Amy Winehouse way').
This obviously doesn't fit in with who we are in the 21st century, but a neat 'get out clause' is for the church to say - "Okay, you're gay - you can be a bishop...but just don't do the sex stuff".
In that way, they're actually complying with the written word of the Lord, in that, the Bible doesn't say that you cannot be a man and fancy David Beckham, Tom Hardy or Jason Statham. It just says that if you do, and you sleep with them, then you're an abomination.
hc4361
<<<<There are plenty of gay people who have never had sex for one reason or another, just as there are many heterosexual virgins.>>>>
I think that you are talking about the fully grown and developed of the human species.
If they have NEVER had sex then how can they know whether they are homosexual or heterosexual?
This is for my own education.
<<<<There are plenty of gay people who have never had sex for one reason or another, just as there are many heterosexual virgins.>>>>
I think that you are talking about the fully grown and developed of the human species.
If they have NEVER had sex then how can they know whether they are homosexual or heterosexual?
This is for my own education.
I think you have it arse backwards JJ To be a veggie or a TT you need to refrain from something. You can't refrain from something in your head and yet still do it and claim to be TT or Veggie at the same time. Whereas you can be homosexual and not practice your preferred sexual practices.
It's the church's old viewpoint that it is the deed they find sinful rather than your desire, which it is assumed you have less control over.
Uh Sqad, I guess folk know their preferences before trying out the act.
It's the church's old viewpoint that it is the deed they find sinful rather than your desire, which it is assumed you have less control over.
Uh Sqad, I guess folk know their preferences before trying out the act.
JTH
<<<<Sexuality of whichever persuasion is about more than the sex-act, sqad. >>>
Who said?....if i am male and fancy sex with a man.....I am homosexual.....if fancy sex with a woman then i am heterosexual.........on has to sample the goods before you decide.
<<<You can tell at an early age exactly what is setting off your radar/gaydar........long before you actually get round to the 'business'.>>>>
So they say, but i wonder if their environmental factors, parents or friends or perhaps occupation or even "trends" have anything to contribute.?
<<<<Sexuality of whichever persuasion is about more than the sex-act, sqad. >>>
Who said?....if i am male and fancy sex with a man.....I am homosexual.....if fancy sex with a woman then i am heterosexual.........on has to sample the goods before you decide.
<<<You can tell at an early age exactly what is setting off your radar/gaydar........long before you actually get round to the 'business'.>>>>
So they say, but i wonder if their environmental factors, parents or friends or perhaps occupation or even "trends" have anything to contribute.?