I fail to see why the fears over Murdoch's monopoly of a nation's media should be the exclusive preserve of 'the left'.
I am not left-wing, but I share with many, of all political and social pursuasions, a wish for Murdoch's grip to be broken, it is not good for the wider society.
The control of a large swathe of international media must affect the impartiality with which news is delievered to the wider world.
Murdoch makes no secret of his 'hands on' approach to the delivery of news through his outlets, so his decisions on the style and editorial content of the news I receive from those outlets has a direct effect on my perception of the events in the world around me, as they are reported.
/// Miliband said: 'I think that we've got to look at the situation whereby one person can own more than 20 per cent of the newspaper market, the Sky platform and Sky News.///
More than 20% of the newspaper market eh? that means some others own the other 80%.
The Sky platform? There is always Terrestrial and Cable.
Sky News? The choice is yours there is always the BBC News, The ITV News, Channel 4 & 5 News to name a few.
/// and editorial content of the news I receive from those outlets has a direct effect on my perception of the events in the world around me, as they are reported. ///
So you don't believe that the BBC has a particular 'Left' slant on things?
But the choice is yours, you're free to gather your news from other sources just as you are free to read the newspapers of your choice.
Murdoch had control of about 40% of the UK newspaper market before the NotW closed, I believe. (Can't find a link to substantiate this.) That is definitely dominating. Plus 39% of Sky, which would now be 100% if all this hadn't blown up. Plus, it seems, quite a few coppers in his pocket.
as for the BBC's bias, would that have anything to do with their political editor, Nick Robinson, aka Blue Robbo, former president of the Oxford University Conservative Association?