Donate SIGN UP

Should these two be tried for Treason?

Avatar Image
Bobbisox | 09:11 Thu 21st Jul 2011 | News
226 Answers
http://www.dailymail....anistan.html?ITO=1490


What makes people who are born into a free society such as ours, go and take up arms against us?
Surely they should be tried for treason as British Nationals fighting against their own country.

btw, this was on the News this morning and not a rant of the DM
Gravatar

Answers

201 to 220 of 226rss feed

First Previous 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
em10 LOL..don't complicate the thread.
//at the invitation of Afghanistan //

that's the funniest thing I've ever heard!!

Hamid Karzai was put in place after the invasion.

that's a bit like coming home to find a squatter in your house and getting told

"It's OK the squatter who was here before me invited me in!"
Sqad Not complicating it at all, the two men mentioned by Bobbisox
should be sent to prison if found guilty, but you mentioned the
Mau Mau?
Question Author
I'm past caring now sqad, we've had cricket in here so what the hell?..:-)
cor you lot are switching sides quicker than a talibini brummie.
Yes, they should be tried for treason
Incidently treason was effectively abolished by the Statute Law Revision Act 1953,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_Act_1945

under the notoriously pinko government of Winston Churchill
Question Author
so what could they charge them with...if guilty, of course
em10....come on....sense of humour....tongue in cheek and all that....didn't you see the "LOL?"
The last person to mention British Nationals fighting against British soldiers and should be tried for treason was Tony Blair.
There is still a legislative mechanism for dealing with 'traitorous actions', though, and this should be implemented if the facts, in this case, are shown to be as first appears.
Question Author
em10 :o)
Sounds like they have not comitted an offence on British soil to me

I suggest they should be tried under Afghan law.

I wonder if they have a crime of fighting against a foreign invading force.
-- answer removed --
sqad i did get it, honest injun, or shouldn't i say that....
Question Author
they are said to be British jtp?
so they are fighting against an invading force..in Afghanistan, is this what you mean?
having a look at Sky News, it seems to indicate they are British Afghanis
Question Author
obviously living here then em?
Question Author
so why don't they go back and live under Talban rule over there instead of living here, they can't be working so I wonder what is their source of income
Presume so.

201 to 220 of 226rss feed

First Previous 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should these two be tried for Treason?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.