News1 min ago
Golliwogs and morons
Quick question based on a previous post.
I understand that there are MANY people who have childhood toys in the shape of golliwogs - and tees people don't have a racist bone in their body. They're simply a toy right?
Now some people have said that golliwogs have become the subject of a PC-ban.
But to those people, I would like to ask this - if you were invited to a child's birthday party, and the kid was black. Would you buy them a golliwog as a present, or would you think, "Hang on...this could be seriously misconstrued".
So - would you buy a golly for a black child?
I understand that there are MANY people who have childhood toys in the shape of golliwogs - and tees people don't have a racist bone in their body. They're simply a toy right?
Now some people have said that golliwogs have become the subject of a PC-ban.
But to those people, I would like to ask this - if you were invited to a child's birthday party, and the kid was black. Would you buy them a golliwog as a present, or would you think, "Hang on...this could be seriously misconstrued".
So - would you buy a golly for a black child?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Sir Alec - in your mother's time society was very very different - and casual racism was simply an accepted part of society - as has been evidednced by the Enid Blyton references.
As a child, I clearly remember reading Noddy books in which the Gollies were the villains, and of course, as a child, that concept meant nothing. As society moves on, attitudes to cultural icons alter, and it is part of a tolerent society that we accept simple adjustments that make little or no difference to us personally.
Thus, i have no problem with Gollies, apart from that they are ugly, but would be sensitive to a black person who may be upset by their conotation.
There are far more important things to be upset about in the world - so making a simple adjustment to prevent discomfort in others is the park of a civilised society.
As a child, I clearly remember reading Noddy books in which the Gollies were the villains, and of course, as a child, that concept meant nothing. As society moves on, attitudes to cultural icons alter, and it is part of a tolerent society that we accept simple adjustments that make little or no difference to us personally.
Thus, i have no problem with Gollies, apart from that they are ugly, but would be sensitive to a black person who may be upset by their conotation.
There are far more important things to be upset about in the world - so making a simple adjustment to prevent discomfort in others is the park of a civilised society.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.