ChatterBank1 min ago
Is it really 'old fashioned' to teach basic knowledge, facts and figures?
68 Answers
http://www.dailymail....ll-TV-advert-dog.html
Today's school children may be brilliant when it comes to operating the latest electronic devices etc. but when it comes to all round general knowledge they sometimes tend to be lacking in many ways.
Are they not taught, or perhaps even their teachers are lacking in some way?
Today's school children may be brilliant when it comes to operating the latest electronic devices etc. but when it comes to all round general knowledge they sometimes tend to be lacking in many ways.
Are they not taught, or perhaps even their teachers are lacking in some way?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
You cannot blame the teachers all the time AOG, it's a typical knee-jerk reaction to asume that teachers are at fault for the massive gaps in education.
Teachers are given a National Cuuriculum to deliver, and extremely tight restrictions on the method by which it is delivered - the fault lies with succcessive governments who use education as a vote-catcher, while never seriously addressing the issues involved.
Because successive governments, and the media have combined in telling everyone how useless teachers are, we have a de-motivated profesion with experience staff leaving in droves. If the government and media tell everyone how useless teachers are, eventually everyone will believe it - government, media, pupils, and now, even the teachers themselves.
Try that aproach with your 'heroes' who fight unjustified wars under the same system, and see how long before people start leaving the armed forces.
Teachers are given a National Cuuriculum to deliver, and extremely tight restrictions on the method by which it is delivered - the fault lies with succcessive governments who use education as a vote-catcher, while never seriously addressing the issues involved.
Because successive governments, and the media have combined in telling everyone how useless teachers are, we have a de-motivated profesion with experience staff leaving in droves. If the government and media tell everyone how useless teachers are, eventually everyone will believe it - government, media, pupils, and now, even the teachers themselves.
Try that aproach with your 'heroes' who fight unjustified wars under the same system, and see how long before people start leaving the armed forces.
andy-hughes
/// You cannot blame the teachers all the time AOG, it's a typical knee-jerk reaction to asume that teachers are at fault for the massive gaps in education.///
Perhaps your answer was a typical 'knee-jerk' reaction also, seeing that I only said:
"or perhaps even their teachers are lacking in some way"?
Please note the word "Perhaps".
/// You cannot blame the teachers all the time AOG, it's a typical knee-jerk reaction to asume that teachers are at fault for the massive gaps in education.///
Perhaps your answer was a typical 'knee-jerk' reaction also, seeing that I only said:
"or perhaps even their teachers are lacking in some way"?
Please note the word "Perhaps".
And surprisingly I am agreement with you ummmm.
Wit the Hong Kong teaching which is all about cramming facts and figures in. I have mentioned this one before but several years ago I sat as an ex officio on a Swire's scholarship panel for potential candidates to Oxbridge, a really valuable scholarship akin to a Fulbright or Rhodes.
We had some 20 candidates, all with perfect As, and we really struggled for that very reason you mentioned, ummmm. Incredible knowledge and facts at their fingertips but could they reason, well some/ Could they put their own spin on the debate and bring leadership to the fore on it - what Oxbridge look for in a young scholar? The answer was a resounding and disappointing "No."
Wit the Hong Kong teaching which is all about cramming facts and figures in. I have mentioned this one before but several years ago I sat as an ex officio on a Swire's scholarship panel for potential candidates to Oxbridge, a really valuable scholarship akin to a Fulbright or Rhodes.
We had some 20 candidates, all with perfect As, and we really struggled for that very reason you mentioned, ummmm. Incredible knowledge and facts at their fingertips but could they reason, well some/ Could they put their own spin on the debate and bring leadership to the fore on it - what Oxbridge look for in a young scholar? The answer was a resounding and disappointing "No."
ummmm
/// Intelligence is not just about learning facts and figures.///
Has anything been suggested otherwise?
Intelligence covers a wide number of things, general knowledge being just one, i.e. you need intelligence to realise it is dangerous to walk on a motorway, but you need general knowledge to know what a motorway is.
/// Intelligence is not just about learning facts and figures.///
Has anything been suggested otherwise?
Intelligence covers a wide number of things, general knowledge being just one, i.e. you need intelligence to realise it is dangerous to walk on a motorway, but you need general knowledge to know what a motorway is.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.