Editor's Blog1 min ago
The BNP - what a bunch of crooks
When they got 2 of their members elected to the Euro Parliament
instead of a feeling of achievement and validation - they saw it as
an opportunity to fill their boots with cash!!Surely they are finished
as a Party now!
Are the BNP and EDL mates?Do they work together for a common goal?
instead of a feeling of achievement and validation - they saw it as
an opportunity to fill their boots with cash!!Surely they are finished
as a Party now!
Are the BNP and EDL mates?Do they work together for a common goal?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by kinkajou2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AS I said if you have an agenda no argument sways you. So an organisation that employs thousands employed 4 bad apples I am pretty sure any business of comprable size would have at least as many?
And how do the bad apples re-inforce your argument? Argue from a bias point but then offset its political/news programing as a percentage of its total out put?
However the most cursory look at the internet gives us these BNP members convicted of crimes, not all as heinous as those abouve but:
Nick Griffin (Party Chairman), Tony Lecomber, Colin Smith, John Tyndall, Warren Bennett, Steve Belshaw, Kevin Scott ,Robert Bennett.
And how do the bad apples re-inforce your argument? Argue from a bias point but then offset its political/news programing as a percentage of its total out put?
However the most cursory look at the internet gives us these BNP members convicted of crimes, not all as heinous as those abouve but:
Nick Griffin (Party Chairman), Tony Lecomber, Colin Smith, John Tyndall, Warren Bennett, Steve Belshaw, Kevin Scott ,Robert Bennett.
Davethedog posted just a few as an example just an example to the bnp thugs
this person must top the list
>>During the BBC man's trial, it emerged that the £40k-a-year journalist had tortured his victim to death in Cheshire, having tied up his children and forced them to watch. Brian Waters was beaten, whipped, burned and attacked with an industrial staple gun. He died after being hung upside down and sexually assaulted with a metal bar. <<
there are plenty more on the web if you wish to have a look
this person must top the list
>>During the BBC man's trial, it emerged that the £40k-a-year journalist had tortured his victim to death in Cheshire, having tied up his children and forced them to watch. Brian Waters was beaten, whipped, burned and attacked with an industrial staple gun. He died after being hung upside down and sexually assaulted with a metal bar. <<
there are plenty more on the web if you wish to have a look
"I though you might like to tell us what out there is better."
the discussion is not about who does or doesnt make good progs, its about the tax levied to keep a bloated biased leftwing organisation in the style its become accustomed to, yet having no interest in watching its output, but maybe wanting to watch another producers output.
It would be exactly the same if a tax was levied on my Sainsburies shopping to keep Tescos in business, even if i dont shop or want any Tescos products.
Let the BBC compete in the open market for ad revenuese and charge subscription fees for its products, lets see how good it is then
the discussion is not about who does or doesnt make good progs, its about the tax levied to keep a bloated biased leftwing organisation in the style its become accustomed to, yet having no interest in watching its output, but maybe wanting to watch another producers output.
It would be exactly the same if a tax was levied on my Sainsburies shopping to keep Tescos in business, even if i dont shop or want any Tescos products.
Let the BBC compete in the open market for ad revenuese and charge subscription fees for its products, lets see how good it is then
bazwillrun
You actually make a valid point. Up until September 1955, there was only the BBC - so the licence fee made perfect sense.
However, in today's digital multi-channel world, you could argue that the BBC has an unfair advantage in that it has a guaranteed revenue stream from the licence.
Problem is - if you took away that licence and the BBC became a subscription channel, we would all lose out.
This is why - there is no subscription based channel in the UK which doesn't rely on advertising.
If the BBC were to change it's business model and started competiting for advertising revenue with the commercial channels, we would lose anything that wasn't geared towards maximum audiences.
BBC Sport would suddenly become a paid for channel, and the number of quality dramas would decrease.
If you've ever had a look at American telly, you'd see what I mean.
Oh, and another thing - with no public service remit, the BBC would be free to lean even further to the left!!!
You actually make a valid point. Up until September 1955, there was only the BBC - so the licence fee made perfect sense.
However, in today's digital multi-channel world, you could argue that the BBC has an unfair advantage in that it has a guaranteed revenue stream from the licence.
Problem is - if you took away that licence and the BBC became a subscription channel, we would all lose out.
This is why - there is no subscription based channel in the UK which doesn't rely on advertising.
If the BBC were to change it's business model and started competiting for advertising revenue with the commercial channels, we would lose anything that wasn't geared towards maximum audiences.
BBC Sport would suddenly become a paid for channel, and the number of quality dramas would decrease.
If you've ever had a look at American telly, you'd see what I mean.
Oh, and another thing - with no public service remit, the BBC would be free to lean even further to the left!!!
Factor30 thank you the name escaped me but I was thinking the same as you.
Again the fact that some people were bad apples has no relevance does it? You are arguing what? Most bad people were employed by some one at some time or are you trying to imply the BBC went out of thier way to employ such people.
I'd be carful whatever small shred of credibility you may still have in eyes of some people is at stake.
Again the fact that some people were bad apples has no relevance does it? You are arguing what? Most bad people were employed by some one at some time or are you trying to imply the BBC went out of thier way to employ such people.
I'd be carful whatever small shred of credibility you may still have in eyes of some people is at stake.
Davethedog read my earlier post, the bnp post a video and list of the bbc baddies
i have been waiting to see what the bbc would answer with
is this to me >> I'd be carful whatever small shred of credibility you may still have in eyes of some people is at stake. <<
not interested mate, if i could i would put the posts i do not like in the same place as the letters the tvl send me
the shredder :)
i have been waiting to see what the bbc would answer with
is this to me >> I'd be carful whatever small shred of credibility you may still have in eyes of some people is at stake. <<
not interested mate, if i could i would put the posts i do not like in the same place as the letters the tvl send me
the shredder :)
"with no public service remit, the BBC would be free to lean even further to the left!!!"
but if I didnt have to pay a tax to them in order to watch other broadcasters I couldnt care less how far to the left they go
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------
ankou
youre making yourself look pretty silly now, show me a link i've used that I couldnt have got from other sites. The link i used earlier was from wiki
but if I didnt have to pay a tax to them in order to watch other broadcasters I couldnt care less how far to the left they go
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------
ankou
youre making yourself look pretty silly now, show me a link i've used that I couldnt have got from other sites. The link i used earlier was from wiki
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.