ChatterBank3 mins ago
First non-white 'Heathcliff' charged with racial abuse.
41 Answers
/// On one occasion, when they refused to let him in to see his daughter, he yelled racist abuse at them. ‘I will smash your head against the wall and there will be no baby . . . you ****ing P*** bitches,’ he said. ///
/// He also sent text messages to his ex-girlfriend which read: ‘You little P*** ***. If I catch you I’m going to kill you. ///
Judging from the charge against him, it seems the racial aspect is more serious than the threats to smash his ex-lover's head against the wall, or even to kill her.
/// He also sent text messages to his ex-girlfriend which read: ‘You little P*** ***. If I catch you I’m going to kill you. ///
Judging from the charge against him, it seems the racial aspect is more serious than the threats to smash his ex-lover's head against the wall, or even to kill her.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ChuckFickens
/// So has it not occurred to you that the sort of person that would enter into a mixed race partnership in the first place is not going to be an inherently racist person so any fights/violence would be driven by domestic reasons and not race reasons. ///
I am afraid your argument is a little weak, referring to the case in question both persons belonged to races who I presume are not likely to be racially abused by each other, also by partnering each other they are not going to be 'inherently racist persons' (your words) yet their case is not being treated as a 'domestic issue'.
But taking your example, no matter what their original good non racist attitude when they first got together, come a breakup in the relationship all those good intentions will go out the window and physical violence, and insults (be them personal or racial) will most likely systematically take place.
/// So has it not occurred to you that the sort of person that would enter into a mixed race partnership in the first place is not going to be an inherently racist person so any fights/violence would be driven by domestic reasons and not race reasons. ///
I am afraid your argument is a little weak, referring to the case in question both persons belonged to races who I presume are not likely to be racially abused by each other, also by partnering each other they are not going to be 'inherently racist persons' (your words) yet their case is not being treated as a 'domestic issue'.
But taking your example, no matter what their original good non racist attitude when they first got together, come a breakup in the relationship all those good intentions will go out the window and physical violence, and insults (be them personal or racial) will most likely systematically take place.
THECORBYLOON
/// Are white men normally charged with a race-related crime when they attack a non-white wife or partner? ///
All rather hypothetical.
But I cannot see any reason why they wouldn't be, that would be entirely up to the accusations levied against them by their non-white wife's or partners, and if of course the police decided make a racial charge against them.
/// Are white men normally charged with a race-related crime when they attack a non-white wife or partner? ///
All rather hypothetical.
But I cannot see any reason why they wouldn't be, that would be entirely up to the accusations levied against them by their non-white wife's or partners, and if of course the police decided make a racial charge against them.
<<better employed criticising and condemning this racist, bulling, and abusive thug, rather that having a go at me>>
You can't blame people for not being able to distinguish between the two.
<<me for addressing his crime>>
How exactly have you 'addressed' it?
Do you mean picking it out of the papers?
That hardly fits the definition of 'addressing' something.
Perhaps you mean 'drawing attention to it' Though it is a stretch to use one event and some unsubstantiated assertions as a basis for a racial stereotyping argument.
You can't blame people for not being able to distinguish between the two.
<<me for addressing his crime>>
How exactly have you 'addressed' it?
Do you mean picking it out of the papers?
That hardly fits the definition of 'addressing' something.
Perhaps you mean 'drawing attention to it' Though it is a stretch to use one event and some unsubstantiated assertions as a basis for a racial stereotyping argument.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.