Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Do you read more than one paper to get a more balanced view?
Anyone?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sasskins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I get the Daily Mail delivered Monday to Saturday. I like the pull-out puzzles section, the cartoons and a couple of other bits. I don't read the news as it just makes me more confused and frustrated about the world. I glance at the news bits only to update myself as to what is happening.
I also read the local paper twice a week - stuff like "lost cat" or "cat stuck up tree". The sort of story where there is no political slant injected by the reporter.
I also read the local paper twice a week - stuff like "lost cat" or "cat stuck up tree". The sort of story where there is no political slant injected by the reporter.
I don't purchase any newspapers but I do read on line.
And if I am one of those you sheepishly denounced for only reading the Daily Mail, I will take this opportunity to announce that I read most of the news sites and post from various sources at various times.
I must admit to using the DM more often than any others, because it will often report on topical and controversial issues that some, according to their political leanings, will choose to sweep under the carpet.
Incidentally many who criticise the DM almost on a daily basis, will systematically use their site also, if they are reporting on an issue that fits their own particular agenda.
This to me is hypocrisy at it's worse.
And if I am one of those you sheepishly denounced for only reading the Daily Mail, I will take this opportunity to announce that I read most of the news sites and post from various sources at various times.
I must admit to using the DM more often than any others, because it will often report on topical and controversial issues that some, according to their political leanings, will choose to sweep under the carpet.
Incidentally many who criticise the DM almost on a daily basis, will systematically use their site also, if they are reporting on an issue that fits their own particular agenda.
This to me is hypocrisy at it's worse.
I do not buy a newspaper anymore.
Firstly I read the Daily Telegraph. And the BBC. I have started to look at the Mail just to anticipate AOGs questions. If I have time on my hands, the Guardian will get a look. If anything international is going on , I will look at the New York Times, Al jazeera and the Jerusalem Post. There are a couple of regular blogs I go to as well.
Firstly I read the Daily Telegraph. And the BBC. I have started to look at the Mail just to anticipate AOGs questions. If I have time on my hands, the Guardian will get a look. If anything international is going on , I will look at the New York Times, Al jazeera and the Jerusalem Post. There are a couple of regular blogs I go to as well.
sasskins
For me, I like the writing style of the Independent and Observer. The Guardian I read occasionally, but I often get the impression that it's overly pandering to my liberal/left of centre views.
The Telegraph has the best cryptic crossword (ie. the only one I can complete)
AOG - re: quoting from the Daily Mail...I can't answer for others, but I myself will link to the Daily Mail, because no-one can *then* accuse me of using sources with a left wing bias on the story.
It also saves time. If a story is published in the Observer, with a leftish spin on it, eventually, during the thread, someone will post a link to the Mail, or Express.
Cutting to the chase saves time.
For me, I like the writing style of the Independent and Observer. The Guardian I read occasionally, but I often get the impression that it's overly pandering to my liberal/left of centre views.
The Telegraph has the best cryptic crossword (ie. the only one I can complete)
AOG - re: quoting from the Daily Mail...I can't answer for others, but I myself will link to the Daily Mail, because no-one can *then* accuse me of using sources with a left wing bias on the story.
It also saves time. If a story is published in the Observer, with a leftish spin on it, eventually, during the thread, someone will post a link to the Mail, or Express.
Cutting to the chase saves time.
If I were to post a link from the Guardian or Observer, the right would instantly dismiss it because of the source. So it saves time and means you are likely to get a reply if you quote from the Daily Mail. It is disappointing when certain people choose to disbelieve their own paper when it doesn't follow their own agenda.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.