Pendleside Christmas Dingbats. Cd 6/1/25
Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Should the UK Take Sides?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17157497
Haque seems to think so! So now we can join with Al Qaeda in overthrowing the government. Isn't this foreign policy likely to cause future problems? In this case by arming the rebels is there a danger of developing into fully an unreversible civil war with many more casualties. Russia is quite capable of aiding the Syria regime to add to the conflict.
Haque seems to think so! So now we can join with Al Qaeda in overthrowing the government. Isn't this foreign policy likely to cause future problems? In this case by arming the rebels is there a danger of developing into fully an unreversible civil war with many more casualties. Russia is quite capable of aiding the Syria regime to add to the conflict.
Answers
1 to 7 of 7
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1100. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sorry, I thought it was common knowledge that Al Qaeda are operating in Syria with the same aim to topple the regime.
http://rt.com/news/us...da-syria-otrakji-635/
http://rt.com/news/us...da-syria-otrakji-635/
"Sorry, I thought it was common knowledge that Al Qaeda are operating in Syria with the same aim to topple the regime.
http://rt.com/news/us...da-syria-otrakji-635/
"
It would help your case if you quoted more reliable sources than rt.com, which most reasonable people would acknowledge is merely a mouthpiece for a government which is shamelessly propping up Assad. And moreover using the same argument which it was, ironically, using to beat the UK over the head with some months ago: i.e. that for some years the UK government placated Gaddafi by shopping Libyan dissidents, on the dubious pretext that they were Al Qaeda members or of that ilk.
The other night I watched this so-called "news" channel try to justify their government's policy: the inference was that better women and children die at the hands of Russian-made tanks and artillery than that God forbid we should let Al Qaeda in. It was pretty sickening, if not, to be honest, surprising.
http://rt.com/news/us...da-syria-otrakji-635/
"
It would help your case if you quoted more reliable sources than rt.com, which most reasonable people would acknowledge is merely a mouthpiece for a government which is shamelessly propping up Assad. And moreover using the same argument which it was, ironically, using to beat the UK over the head with some months ago: i.e. that for some years the UK government placated Gaddafi by shopping Libyan dissidents, on the dubious pretext that they were Al Qaeda members or of that ilk.
The other night I watched this so-called "news" channel try to justify their government's policy: the inference was that better women and children die at the hands of Russian-made tanks and artillery than that God forbid we should let Al Qaeda in. It was pretty sickening, if not, to be honest, surprising.
1 to 7 of 7
