Should we heed these warnings and not deport Qatada

[pdq1]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17797194

Could the threat also be aimed at the EHCR judges. If they reject Qatada's appeal for deportation are they not equally culpable.

[anotheoldgit]

Wrong thread

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.telegraph....tada-is-deported.html

[pdq1]

Thanks AOG I don't know where that report escaped to

http://www.dailymail....K-terror-attacks.html

[anotheoldgit]

If it was all that easy to attack us they would have done so before, regardless of whether we deport Qatada or not.

[FredPuli43]

Who cares? They can make all the threats they like. We can live with that. If they want to try to attack, let them try and probably fail, for we are not to be dictated to or blackmailed by extremists.

But compulsory micro-chipping of dogs? That's scandalous! lol.

[New Judge]

Of course we should pay heed. We already have ECHR judges determining who can and cannot be removed from the UK so we might as well also be dictated to by Somalian terrorists.

[Brenden]

Typical of these people, get what you want by violence - peaceful people - you are having a larff. (not a spelling mistake rather like this version)

[naomi24]

//Last week al Qaeda itself warned it would “open the gates of evil” if the Government continues with the deportation.//

What a delightful turn of phrase! Funny how they're so desperate for him to stay in a country they despise so much. It says a lot for their confidence in their own.

To answer the question, no we should not heed their warnings – and to put it bluntly I'll use another delightful turn of phrase .... stuff ‘em – and him!

[emmie]

no we shouldn't be held to ransom, stuff them and him, let us get rid soon as possible.