Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Why do they...
25 Answers
call these executions when they are nothing less than acts of murder committed by lawless scum
http://www.guardian.c...n-video?newsfeed=true
http://www.guardian.c...n-video?newsfeed=true
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's interesting how labels are applied. For example, I heard a R4 news report last week (or maybe the week before) which described Syrian protesters as "activists" at 6.00am, but they'd become "rebels" by 8.00am!
It is an execution, execution being "untimely death" by law. It just happens that they law they're using isn't one we approve of, or the law of the land. I think it's just a perception/perspective question really.
It is an execution, execution being "untimely death" by law. It just happens that they law they're using isn't one we approve of, or the law of the land. I think it's just a perception/perspective question really.
bazwillrun
I see what you're saying, but for me 'execution' doesn't carry the weight of justice on it's side. Yes, I agree that when (say) Aileen Wournos (America's first female serieal killer) was put to death, she was 'executed' rather than 'murdered', but I think where you have people killed specifically for political ends, it should be referred to as 'execution' rather than 'murder', which I think actually downplays the seriousness of the act.
But like I say - I get where you're coming from...but the don't agree with your conclusion.
I see what you're saying, but for me 'execution' doesn't carry the weight of justice on it's side. Yes, I agree that when (say) Aileen Wournos (America's first female serieal killer) was put to death, she was 'executed' rather than 'murdered', but I think where you have people killed specifically for political ends, it should be referred to as 'execution' rather than 'murder', which I think actually downplays the seriousness of the act.
But like I say - I get where you're coming from...but the don't agree with your conclusion.
mur·der /ˈmɜrdər/ Show Spelled[mur-der] Show IPA
noun
1. Law . the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder).
ex·e·cu·tion
noun
4. the process of performing a judgment or sentence of a court: The judge stayed execution of the sentence pending appeal
noun
1. Law . the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder).
ex·e·cu·tion
noun
4. the process of performing a judgment or sentence of a court: The judge stayed execution of the sentence pending appeal
Yes I see you've selected the 4'th definition of execution. you didn't like number 3 then?
the infliction of capital punishment or, formerly, of any legal punishment.
I'd take issue with that you can after all have an extra-judicial execution.
Typically used to refer to state sponsored killings.
Usualy done in cold blood - unlike say the killings of all those Iranian nuclear scientists recently - so those would be assassinations rather than executions
the infliction of capital punishment or, formerly, of any legal punishment.
I'd take issue with that you can after all have an extra-judicial execution.
Typically used to refer to state sponsored killings.
Usualy done in cold blood - unlike say the killings of all those Iranian nuclear scientists recently - so those would be assassinations rather than executions
In this case I would have thought it would be classed an execution, since the victim was kidnapped (and don't start by saying "no he wasn't he was captured") anyway they got hold of him and then threatened to 'execute' him unless a ransom was paid.
Doubt they would have used the words 'threatened to murder him'.
Doubt they would have used the words 'threatened to murder him'.